↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Categorical versus dimensional thinking: improving anti-stigma campaigns by matching health message frames and implicit worldviews

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Summary News Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Categorical versus dimensional thinking: improving anti-stigma campaigns by matching health message frames and implicit worldviews
Published in
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11747-019-00673-7
Authors

Jan-Hinrich Meyer, Ko De Ruyter, Dhruv Grewal, Kathleen Cleeren, Debbie Isobel Keeling, Scott Motyka

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 23 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Master 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 31 26%
Unknown 29 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 31 26%
Unspecified 23 19%
Psychology 8 7%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 31 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,940,111
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
#82
of 750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,782
of 347,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.