You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Categorical versus dimensional thinking: improving anti-stigma campaigns by matching health message frames and implicit worldviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11747-019-00673-7 |
| Authors |
Jan-Hinrich Meyer, Ko De Ruyter, Dhruv Grewal, Kathleen Cleeren, Debbie Isobel Keeling, Scott Motyka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 138 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 5% |
| Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 63 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 34 | 25% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 4% |
| Design | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 67 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,940,111
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
#82
of 750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,782
of 347,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.