You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Exploiting Secreted Luciferases to Monitor Tumor Progression In Vivo.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 10 |
| Book title |
Tumor Immunology
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3338-9_10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3336-5, 978-1-4939-3338-9
|
| Authors |
Laura Falcone, Monica Casucci, Falcone, Laura, Casucci, Monica |
| Editors |
Attilio Bondanza, Monica Casucci |
| Abstract |
Secreted luciferases provide a simple, accurate, and cost-effective tool to monitor tumor response after treatment in small animal models. This protocol describes all the steps required to generate human tumor cell lines expressing this reporter gene and to monitor in vivo tumor progression after injection in immunocompromised mice by means of serial peripheral blood sampling and analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 16% |
| Researcher | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2016.
All research outputs
#20,318,358
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,916
of 13,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,693
of 393,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1,053
of 1,470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.