↓ Skip to main content

Improved Implementation of Rupture Location Uncertainty in Fault Displacement Hazard AssessmentShort Note

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improved Implementation of Rupture Location Uncertainty in Fault Displacement Hazard AssessmentShort Note
Published in
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, July 2019
DOI 10.1785/0120180305
Authors

Rui Chen, Mark D. Petersen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 44%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Professor 2 13%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 38%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2019.
All research outputs
#5,992,668
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
#425
of 1,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,317
of 345,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.