↓ Skip to main content

Improved Implementation of Rupture Location Uncertainty in Fault Displacement Hazard Assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improved Implementation of Rupture Location Uncertainty in Fault Displacement Hazard Assessment
Published in
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, July 2019
DOI 10.1785/0120180305
Authors

Rui Chen, Mark D. Petersen

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 46%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Professor 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 46%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,984,184
of 15,771,486 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
#256
of 818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,826
of 265,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,771,486 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.