The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Key factors for adopting inner source
|
---|---|
Published in |
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1145/2533685 |
Authors |
Klaas-Jan Stol, Paris Avgeriou, Muhammad Ali Babar, Yan Lucas, Brian Fitzgerald |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 98 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 22% |
Student > Master | 22 | 22% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
Researcher | 4 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 13% |
Unknown | 27 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 53 | 52% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 13% |
Engineering | 4 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 29 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,494,138
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
#65
of 281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,320
of 226,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 281 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them