↓ Skip to main content

Key factors for adopting inner source

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Key factors for adopting inner source
Published in
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, April 2014
DOI 10.1145/2533685
Authors

Klaas-Jan Stol, Paris Avgeriou, Muhammad Ali Babar, Yan Lucas, Brian Fitzgerald

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 95 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Student > Master 22 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Researcher 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 53 54%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 13%
Engineering 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 26 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,494,138
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
#65
of 281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,320
of 226,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 281 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them