↓ Skip to main content

Therapeutic ultrasound for acute ankle sprains

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
33 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
400 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Therapeutic ultrasound for acute ankle sprains
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001250.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michel PJ van den Bekerom, Daniëlle AWM van der Windt, Gerben ter Riet, Geert J van der Heijden, Lex M Bouter

Abstract

Ultrasound is used in the treatment of a wide variety of musculoskeletal disorders, which include acute ankle sprains. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 1999, and previously updated in 2004.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 391 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 80 20%
Student > Master 56 14%
Student > Postgraduate 33 8%
Other 27 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 6%
Other 82 21%
Unknown 97 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 148 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 14%
Sports and Recreations 39 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 3%
Psychology 9 2%
Other 24 6%
Unknown 109 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,165,368
of 26,445,486 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,198
of 13,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,479
of 127,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,445,486 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.