↓ Skip to main content

Global research priorities to mitigate plastic pollution impacts on marine wildlife

Overview of attention for article published in Endangered Species Research, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 845)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
6 policy sources
twitter
182 X users
facebook
18 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
283 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
923 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global research priorities to mitigate plastic pollution impacts on marine wildlife
Published in
Endangered Species Research, October 2014
DOI 10.3354/esr00623
Authors

AC Vegter, M Barletta, C Beck, J Borrero, H Burton, ML Campbell, MF Costa, M Eriksen, C Eriksson, A Estrades, KVK Gilardi, BD Hardesty, JA Ivar do Sul, JL Lavers, B Lazar, L Lebreton, WJ Nichols, CA Ribic, PG Ryan, QA Schuyler, SDA Smith, H Takada, KA Townsend, CCC Wabnitz, C Wilcox, LC Young, M Hamann

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 182 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 923 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 907 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 175 19%
Student > Master 153 17%
Researcher 118 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 100 11%
Student > Postgraduate 40 4%
Other 112 12%
Unknown 225 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 253 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 199 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 44 5%
Engineering 26 3%
Social Sciences 25 3%
Other 109 12%
Unknown 267 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 150. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2021.
All research outputs
#295,993
of 26,564,146 outputs
Outputs from Endangered Species Research
#14
of 845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,679
of 271,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endangered Species Research
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,564,146 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.