↓ Skip to main content

Case study of a method of development of a selection process for community health workers in sub-Saharan Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Case study of a method of development of a selection process for community health workers in sub-Saharan Africa
Published in
Human Resources for Health, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12960-019-0412-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Celia Brown, Richard Lilford, Frances Griffiths, Prince Oppong-Darko, Myness Ndambo, Marion Okoh-Owusu, Emily Wroe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 24 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Social Sciences 8 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Philosophy 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 23 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#14,545,031
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#952
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,624
of 375,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#18
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.