↓ Skip to main content

Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Human Behaviour, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
book_reviews
1 book reviewer
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
250 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts
Published in
Nature Human Behaviour, November 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41562-019-0766-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey Lees, Mina Cikara

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 250 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 193 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 21%
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Researcher 18 9%
Other 13 7%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 40 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 72 37%
Social Sciences 29 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 45 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 245. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#160,995
of 26,352,576 outputs
Outputs from Nature Human Behaviour
#298
of 1,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,191
of 379,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Human Behaviour
#9
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,352,576 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 156.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.