↓ Skip to main content

Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Human Behaviour, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
272 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts
Published in
Nature Human Behaviour, November 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41562-019-0766-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey Lees, Mina Cikara

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 272 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 27%
Student > Master 12 15%
Other 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 34%
Social Sciences 10 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 17 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 217. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2020.
All research outputs
#88,923
of 16,639,069 outputs
Outputs from Nature Human Behaviour
#141
of 959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,945
of 329,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Human Behaviour
#8
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,639,069 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 142.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.