↓ Skip to main content

Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Human Behaviour, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
270 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts
Published in
Nature Human Behaviour, November 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41562-019-0766-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey Lees, Mina Cikara

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 270 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Student > Master 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 50%
Social Sciences 3 15%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 198. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2020.
All research outputs
#73,216
of 14,158,001 outputs
Outputs from Nature Human Behaviour
#106
of 754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,979
of 313,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Human Behaviour
#15
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,158,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.