↓ Skip to main content

Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Human Behaviour, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
280 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts
Published in
Nature Human Behaviour, November 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41562-019-0766-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey Lees, Mina Cikara

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 280 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 25%
Student > Master 23 16%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 42%
Social Sciences 21 15%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 25 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 230. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2022.
All research outputs
#119,223
of 21,411,922 outputs
Outputs from Nature Human Behaviour
#203
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,140
of 347,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Human Behaviour
#8
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,411,922 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 152.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.