↓ Skip to main content

A Deletion in the Canine POMC Gene Is Associated with Weight and Appetite in Obesity-Prone Labrador Retriever Dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 1,995)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A Deletion in the Canine POMC Gene Is Associated with Weight and Appetite in Obesity-Prone Labrador Retriever Dogs
Published in
Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), May 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.04.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eleanor Raffan, Rowena J. Dennis, Conor J. O’Donovan, Julia M. Becker, Robert A. Scott, Stephen P. Smith, David J. Withers, Claire J. Wood, Elena Conci, Dylan N. Clements, Kim M. Summers, Alexander J. German, Cathryn S. Mellersh, Maja L. Arendt, Valentine P. Iyemere, Elaine Withers, Josefin Söder, Sara Wernersson, Göran Andersson, Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, Giles S.H. Yeo, Stephen O’Rahilly

Abstract

Sequencing of candidate genes for obesity in Labrador retriever dogs identified a 14 bp deletion in pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) with an allele frequency of 12%. The deletion disrupts the β-MSH and β-endorphin coding sequences and is associated with body weight (per allele effect of 0.33 SD), adiposity, and greater food motivation. Among other dog breeds, the deletion was only found in the closely related flat-coat retriever (FCR), where it is similarly associated with body weight and food motivation. The mutation is significantly more common in Labrador retrievers selected to become assistance dogs than pets. In conclusion, the deletion in POMC is a significant modifier of weight and appetite in Labrador retrievers and FCRs and may influence other behavioral traits.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 176 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Denmark 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 143 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 18%
Student > Bachelor 28 18%
Other 25 16%
Student > Master 20 13%
Researcher 15 10%
Other 38 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 30 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 14%
Unspecified 20 13%
Other 16 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1708. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#851
of 12,225,951 outputs
Outputs from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#2
of 1,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42
of 274,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#1
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,225,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.