↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Bleeding Efficiency and Meat Oxidative Stability and Microbiological Quality of New Zealand White Rabbits Subjected to Halal Slaughter without Stunning and Gas Stun-killing

Overview of attention for article published in Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 677)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
47 tweeters
facebook
8 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Summary News Twitter Facebook Video Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bleeding Efficiency and Meat Oxidative Stability and Microbiological Quality of New Zealand White Rabbits Subjected to Halal Slaughter without Stunning and Gas Stun-killing
Published in
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, March 2014
DOI 10.5713/ajas.2013.13437
Pubmed ID
25049968
Authors

K. Nakyinsige, A. B. Fatimah, Z. A. Aghwan, I. Zulkifli, Y. M. Goh, A. Q. Sazili

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 5 5%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 27 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 29%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 28 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#734,021
of 23,942,830 outputs
Outputs from Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
#4
of 677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,342
of 225,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,942,830 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 677 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.