↓ Skip to main content

Oral traditional Chinese medication for adhesive small bowel obstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral traditional Chinese medication for adhesive small bowel obstruction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008836.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tao Suo, Xixi Gu, Roland Andersson, Huaixing Ma, Wei Zhang, Wei Deng, Boheng Zhang, Dingfang Cai, Xinyu Qin

Abstract

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is one of the most common emergent complications of general surgery. Intra-abdominal adhesions are the leading cause of SBO. Because surgery can induce new adhesions, non-operative management is preferred in the absence of signs of peritonitis or strangulation. Oral traditional Chinese herbal medicine has long been used as a non-operative therapy to treat adhesive SBO in China. Many controlled trials have been conducted to investigate its therapeutic value in resolving adhesive SBO.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 195 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 18%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Other 11 6%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 65 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Psychology 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 74 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,993,771
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,729
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,866
of 176,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#121
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.