You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Oral traditional Chinese medication for adhesive small bowel obstruction
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008836.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tao Suo, Xixi Gu, Roland Andersson, Huaixing Ma, Wei Zhang, Wei Deng, Boheng Zhang, Dingfang Cai, Xinyu Qin |
Abstract |
Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is one of the most common emergent complications of general surgery. Intra-abdominal adhesions are the leading cause of SBO. Because surgery can induce new adhesions, non-operative management is preferred in the absence of signs of peritonitis or strangulation. Oral traditional Chinese herbal medicine has long been used as a non-operative therapy to treat adhesive SBO in China. Many controlled trials have been conducted to investigate its therapeutic value in resolving adhesive SBO. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 198 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 37 | 18% |
Researcher | 20 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 5% |
Other | 33 | 16% |
Unknown | 67 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
Psychology | 6 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Other | 25 | 12% |
Unknown | 76 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,993,771
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,729
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,866
of 176,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#121
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.