| Title |
Association of Leisure-Time Physical Activity With Risk of 26 Types of Cancer in 1.44 Million Adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1548 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven C. Moore, I-Min Lee, Elisabete Weiderpass, Peter T. Campbell, Joshua N. Sampson, Cari M. Kitahara, Sarah K. Keadle, Hannah Arem, Amy Berrington de Gonzalez, Patricia Hartge, Hans-Olov Adami, Cindy K. Blair, Kristin B. Borch, Eric Boyd, David P. Check, Agnès Fournier, Neal D. Freedman, Marc Gunter, Mattias Johannson, Kay-Tee Khaw, Martha S. Linet, Nicola Orsini, Yikyung Park, Elio Riboli, Kim Robien, Catherine Schairer, Howard Sesso, Michael Spriggs, Roy Van Dusen, Alicja Wolk, Charles E. Matthews, Alpa V. Patel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,799 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 311 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 157 | 9% |
| Spain | 153 | 9% |
| Canada | 72 | 4% |
| Australia | 47 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 29 | 2% |
| Thailand | 27 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 18 | 1% |
| Brazil | 18 | 1% |
| Other | 255 | 14% |
| Unknown | 712 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1269 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 255 | 14% |
| Scientists | 253 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 20 | 1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1322 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 166 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 166 | 12% |
| Researcher | 164 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 157 | 12% |
| Other | 82 | 6% |
| Other | 262 | 20% |
| Unknown | 341 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 380 | 28% |
| Sports and Recreations | 127 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 111 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 68 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 4% |
| Other | 179 | 13% |
| Unknown | 413 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2771. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,594
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#29
of 11,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16
of 354,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#1
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 84.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.