↓ Skip to main content

Immunization with a heat-killed preparation of the environmental bacterium Mycobacterium vaccae promotes stress resilience in mice

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
182 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immunization with a heat-killed preparation of the environmental bacterium Mycobacterium vaccae promotes stress resilience in mice
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2016
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1600324113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan O. Reber, Philip H. Siebler, Nina C. Donner, James T. Morton, David G. Smith, Jared M. Kopelman, Kenneth R. Lowe, Kristen J. Wheeler, James H. Fox, James E. Hassell, Benjamin N. Greenwood, Charline Jansch, Anja Lechner, Dominic Schmidt, Nicole Uschold-Schmidt, Andrea M. Füchsl, Dominik Langgartner, Frederick R. Walker, Matthew W. Hale, Gerardo Lopez Perez, Will Van Treuren, Antonio González, Andrea L. Halweg-Edwards, Monika Fleshner, Charles L. Raison, Graham A. Rook, Shyamal D. Peddada, Rob Knight, Christopher A. Lowry

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 298 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 57 19%
Student > Bachelor 46 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 15%
Student > Master 32 11%
Professor 18 6%
Other 61 20%
Unknown 45 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 13%
Neuroscience 34 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 11%
Psychology 16 5%
Other 64 21%
Unknown 60 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 517. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#49,967
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,291
of 103,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#992
of 340,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#33
of 853 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 853 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.