You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reduced or modified dietary fat for preventing cardiovascular disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002137.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lee Hooper, Carolyn D Summerbell, Rachel Thompson, Deirdre Sills, Felicia G Roberts, Helen J Moore, George Davey Smith |
| Abstract |
Reduction and modification of dietary fats have differing effects on cardiovascular risk factors (such as serum cholesterol), but their effects on important health outcomes are less clear. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 22 | 24% |
| Australia | 6 | 7% |
| United States | 6 | 7% |
| South Africa | 5 | 5% |
| Ireland | 3 | 3% |
| Turkey | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 30 | 33% |
| Scientists | 11 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 437 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 418 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 80 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 73 | 17% |
| Researcher | 60 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 10% |
| Other | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 61 | 14% |
| Unknown | 92 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 153 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 61 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 54 | 12% |
| Unknown | 104 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 231. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2023.
All research outputs
#152,093
of 24,089,711 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#273
of 12,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#623
of 166,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,089,711 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.