You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Chaperome Networks – Redundancy and Implications for Cancer Treatment
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 6 |
| Book title |
HSF1 and Molecular Chaperones in Biology and Cancer
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-40204-4_6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-040203-7, 978-3-03-040204-4
|
| Authors |
Pengrong Yan, Tai Wang, Monica L. Guzman, Radu I. Peter, Gabriela Chiosis, Yan, Pengrong, Wang, Tai, Guzman, Monica L., Peter, Radu I., Chiosis, Gabriela |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 83% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,088,091
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,067
of 5,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,163
of 480,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#24
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.