@dubbyruntle N95 obviously best, as I think most people know these days. But anything better than nothing if that’s all people have. https://t.co/dPb43CYMIS
RT @RadCentrism: Physics gonna physics. https://t.co/dPb43CYMIS
RT @RadCentrism: Physics gonna physics. https://t.co/dPb43CYMIS
Physics gonna physics. https://t.co/dPb43CYMIS
@RobProvince I know you likely failed non-calc physics, but I believe in you. Have GPT explain it to you. https://t.co/dPb43CYMIS
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
@AdvocatingMomma https://t.co/MnjjvrjWPS def don’t recommend most make😷b/c skill level is🇮🇹master tailor level lol I’m actually a fast sewer even! Washed cotton canvas & poly chiffon instead of interfacing & baste 5 layers & lining separate… b
@MarkChangizi @Anarcho_Cyclist @Loulabelly @brownecfm You sure you’re a scientist??? https://t.co/zW0VZNrVuL
@lairy_poppins @brownecfm @ibrake4ants Science says otherwise
@stkirsch @gorskon Aerosols are also significantly reduced by masks. Is it possible for you to refrain from baselessly claiming any and every death is caused by a vaccine for 24 hours? https://t.co/okFuRYGBZo
@ABridgen "Scientifically discredited"? No chap, they're not. https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPVO https://t.co/85XbVtmT8A https://t.co/YQzxF
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
@DaveTCM17 @ABridgen We knew they reduce the spread of respiratory viruses before SARS-CoV-2 & still do! https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPVO ht
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
@MetalChick616 @Rodney_ii_back @Metsfan281 @nypost above 50% in the entire 10 nm (0.01 micron) to 6.0 micron range, provided they have a tight weave." -National Center for Biotechnology Information, Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in R
@Lisa6264 @gagen_patricia @NoelFritsch @ComposerBarton @FirstHealth Why are you lying? https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
COVID size is 20NM to 500nm. It's at it's largest size it's almost 1000 times smaller than the gaps in the mask. https://t.co/9JMof2sAjA https://t.co/9OstavzioZ
@shoshanahjacobs Maybe in the future we can actually make a mask that's effective against viruses. But right now none exist outside of Airline respirators which I have used both with tank and chemical oxygen or MK type gas mask with charcoal filters. htt
@assholier @Alberta_UCP @ABDanielleSmith Science like what? That the virus is 1 micron thick and cloth masks protect between 10 nanometers and 10 micrometers? Is that the science you’re looking for? Cloth masks don’t work if you’re in a room with someone m
@NefariousKnut @K_d_a7 @TheoFleury14 Why do you lie? https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@JibMonkey @PhilStudge @jakki_jax @JenniferNuzzo @Debunk_the_Funk Theres a difference between "population-wide" conclusions (based on weak studies) and the physics of masks. On Debunk's video above, he has many links to various studies. But this shows *ho
@tapas321 @IndependentSage There's a study here from 2020 investigating the filtering efficiencies of different types of cloth: https://t.co/Sjgs8Mc5iZ The advice above is a little optimistic given the suggested materials, but basically, effective cloth m
@JerLeff @aaronsimpson @nathaliejacoby1 This one is interesting too: “Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks” https://t.co/Cc5k6FIrR6
@I_never_guess @apmalong well, it's not my viewpoint so i don't have them handy but ... google shows this rabbit hole. Masks protect against exhale particulation. You don't get sick from your own exhale. But from someone else's... https://t.co/SEG5GGtAZH
@TheMatrixStorm @John_P_Topham @thisisnothappen @GFUniteMankind @DrEliDavid 1. Face masks work and we knew it before Covid. https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https:
@mr_hacki @1900HO Dann gibt es viele Studien, die zeigen dass unterschiedliche Stoffe Aerosol aus der Atemluft entfernen, z.B. diese zufällig ausgewählte Studie. 2/x https://t.co/J4LHkmtfI6
@JoJoFromJerz Repeated for you as before: https://t.co/yROg9po4ni N95 masks protect 95% on 300nm and above. Covid is 50 to 140nm. https://t.co/uOHkRIUgOf Farts while smaller, at .4nm, the same principle applies. The masks do not filter well to that 5
@IAmSherriBerry @JoJoFromJerz Copied from before: https://t.co/yROg9po4ni N95 masks protect 95% on 300nm and above. Covid is 50 to 140nm. https://t.co/uOHkRIUgOf Farts while smaller, at .4nm, the same principle applies. The masks do not filter well t
@JoJoFromJerz https://t.co/yROg9po4ni N95 masks protect 95% on 300nm and above. Covid is 50 to 140nm. https://t.co/uOHkRIUgOf Facts while smaller, at .4nm, the same principle applies. The masks do not filter well to that 50 to 140nm size. You're a co
@nntaleb @DrEliDavid One layer of 600 TPI cotton combined with two layers of chiffon (90% polyester, 10% spandex) had a large particle and small particle blocking efficacy of 99.2% and 97%, as good as an N95 mask https://t.co/SwwgUGeQTG
@avesatanas @TheyCallMeTarz @liz_churchill8 I’m not sure if you are being sincere https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@vance_lunn @PistolP47127022 @liz_churchill8 That’s a grandiose declaration of them “not working” with zero factual evidence. https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@DrugTim @hammerlock14 @PeterSweden7 Why don’t you answer my question? Also https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@Twiligh21059926 @WBATDM @TheFreds Oh dear, I'll take one of these bits of twaddle. Masks work. https://t.co/cyYD5OS0m5 https://t.co/YaLpvUlY4Q https://t.co/FZHVCCbtlr https://t.co/wOwaiQnHO7 https://t.co/CuqzAXkXiB https://t.co/p1UjSPonLm https://t
@DeanGou77434347 @Johnincarlisle @YouTube Coronaviridae and Orthomyxoviridae are different. Masks work. https://t.co/cyYD5OS0m5 https://t.co/YaLpvUlY4Q https://t.co/FZHVCCbtlr https://t.co/wOwaiQnHO7 https://t.co/CuqzAXkXiB https://t.co/p1UjSPonLm h
@NoMoreEds @YourFerntasy @Johnincarlisle @YouTube Masks are effective in reducing outbound transmission of respiratory viruses. https://t.co/cyYD5OS0m5 https://t.co/YaLpvUlY4Q https://t.co/FZHVCCbtlr https://t.co/wOwaiQnHO7 https://t.co/CuqzAXkXiB ht
RT @MakalMakal: A follow-up for anyone interested in the science behind filtration efficiencies: https://t.co/2X50yg6b2R
@WillioJason @PKalashian @DrEliDavid Aerosols are captured via the electro static effect, https://t.co/T7oF6NXMGV
@VyvyFindsWords @catladyactivist @kdqd3 N-95 and other masks also provide some filtration as well, per "Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks" that also compared to #N95 masks. https://t.co/6fxFeNL2Wm https://t.co/
RT @WeingartenDE: Die #Studie "#Aerosol #Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth #Masks" belegte, das #Baumwolle,…
@carlosg93420312 @ABridgen Why would you not when they reduce outbound transmission of respiratory viruses? https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPV
Empiricism over dogma
RT @RagToo: @GBNEWS Here’s some of that peer reviewed research that the bearded fool states there isn’t https://t.co/eM4BLoHh7X
RT @RagToo: @GBNEWS Here’s some of that peer reviewed research that the bearded fool states there isn’t https://t.co/eM4BLoHh7X
RT @RagToo: @GBNEWS Here’s some of that peer reviewed research that the bearded fool states there isn’t https://t.co/eM4BLoHh7X
RT @walks_sc: @SjMmjs00 @WLancsGP @michael_riordan Science disagrees. https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVC…
RT @walks_sc: @Nelia23893053 @GBNEWS Please understand something about outbound transmission https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlq…
RT @RagToo: @GBNEWS Here’s some of that peer reviewed research that the bearded fool states there isn’t https://t.co/eM4BLoHh7X
@Nelia23893053 @GBNEWS Please understand something about outbound transmission https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPVO https://t.co/85XbVtmT8A ht
@SjMmjs00 @mrmarkdolan Your opinion on masks doesn’t trump facts, I’m afraid. I thought you might like to see this:
@nazarinveronica @Threetarns @mrmarkdolan You're wrong. And selfish. https://t.co/5Z3GvHQfKD
@nazarinveronica @Hicksyfern @phgorleston @mrmarkdolan But masks do reduce outbound transmission of respiratory viruses. https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t
You can’t be that curious as you have turned off comments. It you hadn’t you might have learnt something. Masks work, the research backs that up https://t.co/eM4BLoGJip https://t.co/AIk9AscxDA https://t.co/OPQzi8PnyA
@GBNEWS Here’s some of that peer reviewed research that the bearded fool states there isn’t https://t.co/eM4BLoHh7X
@FelipeCardosoG4 @vitorborin_ @PierreKory @elonmusk Really, I’m curious who pays you guys to propagate and disseminate the misinformation - paid parrots. Oh and here’s your mom’s study https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@NicolaFountain1 @drcwhos @drsimonegold Why are you lying? What is your suck agenda? https://t.co/JJZier2hTl
@DjamesieM @paulmurphy_TD Your stupidity is NOT our problem https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@BillyBakbetter @DrChristineMann @DjamesieM @Doctor_Eric_B @DrEliDavid No answer to my question? And also https://t.co/JJZier2hTl
@NoodleszXX @SpartaJustice Another one who needs enlightenment. It's OK, start with these.... https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPVO https://t.c
@JackHodgson7 @EssexPR And yet the research states otherwise https://t.co/eM4BLoGJip
@KeithB3351 @jimeekay @no_masks_at_all @telfordvillan That's a heck of a misguided statement regarding masks, but I am here to help... https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXk
@dan_mosey @MrSpungoe @GarethJD @EssexPR Oh look here’s another https://t.co/eM4BLoGJip
@Howwethink2 @TakethatCt Oh dear, you went after the profile & masks. Begin your enlightenment with these: https://t.co/cyYD5OS0m5 https://t.co/YaLpvUlY4Q https://t.co/FZHVCCbtlr https://t.co/CuqzAXkXiB https://t.co/p1UjSPonLm https://t.co/85XbVtn
@simonpe22529766 @drclairetaylor Yeah that's not true. its not about the material acting as a mechanical filter but the electrostatic effects of the materials that attract and contain the viruses. https://t.co/n6A6vjlP9H
@Geepawl @ABridgen Oh dear. Begin your enlightenment with these: https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPVO https://t.co/85XbVtmT8A https://t.co/YQ
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
@PeterSweden7 FFS, you don't breathe out viral dust! Read these papers & learn! https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPVO https://t.co/85XbVtmT8
@CarolineSeare @ADAMMCC53 @BabeTruth2 @TomiLahren No I “did my own research” 2 years ago https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@LadyReaper27 @johnMaddox74 @DineshDSouza You can follow the links I provide in this thread to learn more:
@RepThomasMassie Favorite paper of mine as these are “my people” so to speak. https://t.co/SCnVejGr7p
@DavidLopan14 @amandalhu @HWDSB Masks work. Better masks work better. https://t.co/Y9nK1ONOcw ... https://t.co/rJhEJYjN1k ... https://t.co/OATzssZJQz ... https://t.co/797p4sa7Wi ... https://t.co/xU7njcUgxL ... https://t.co/gzUpcnHA9h ... https://t