@hardhitsafety @cryptosweeper @Leftylockdowns1 So...what's your problem. What do you think we should have done three weeks into the pandemic? Give up. And re:masks it's not like that's been "proven" either. https://t.co/O9YyQOj8Ji
@AsherJacobson74 @PhaatBoyz @TheEliKlein Masks reduce your chances of infection and spread. That's been almost conclusively established. All I said was expecting people to voluntarily quarantine in some facility is optimistic. Many didn't do it in their ow
@CotswoldsGeezer @megan_cellucci @FtwPik @singinglouder3 @stephmurrayyyy If that seems reasonable to you, okay, but the science seems pretty settled regarding the fact that masks do provide some beneficial effect. https://t.co/O9YyQOj8Ji
@SusieBdds @MSNBC I misread your post. I've never seen stats saying that low outgoing. Not even for incoming. Fit is important and many can't or WON'T wear a mask properly. That doesn't mean "give up". As a teacher, if I become an asymptomatic carrier, it
@Sherry23932423 @BriS314 @angryarlmom That's not really accurate. Most studies showed cloth masks weren't the best protection, but were better protection than no protection. And there are many types of cloth, and layering, with varying degrees of effective
@pradatonadas @Pamcake51646863 @kristiwelshies @nnnnnevaeh Just pointing out that you are 100% oblivious to the capability of the masks, and that maybe you should read some of those studies. Here's some links, maybe read up so you aren't made a fool of aga
@Pamcake51646863 @TammyRolfe @kristiwelshies @nnnnnevaeh "However, aerosols remain suspended in the air for longer durations due to their small size, and play a key role in spreading infection" "droplets that are smaller than 1 μm tend to stay in the envi
@Pamcake51646863 @kristiwelshies @nnnnnevaeh https://t.co/z40eb4BaH2 Yes it has, and everyone is too busy or too stupid using "masks" as a political cudgel to have read the data.
@TammyRolfe @Pamcake51646863 @kristiwelshies @nnnnnevaeh https://t.co/itXQISQUXG There you go! So, you were saying....
@rhak137 @DutchCloggs @FT Here is a meta-analysis on the effectiveness of masks, distancing, and eye protection. https://t.co/atEGMTf1LA And here are two studies from April 2020: https://t.co/IGjTOz1pJ5 https://t.co/lcXju70pub This one was published
@AndyWanKenobii @sdbrydges @whymusti7 @ckduder @AmericanJaeger @thevivafrei Masks don’t work? Wtf man. 2 years in And you’re still parroting antimasker bullsh#t? Why? What’s your agenda? https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@gregmaisto @shane_berkman @AmericanJaeger @thevivafrei you’re going to need to back that bullshi# up with citations, links and sources. This isn’t your echo chamber where we clap as you parrot antivax sheeplespeak #Omnicronvoy #FluTruxKlanGoHome #OttawaS
@SBVRLT078 It’s no so much that they do nothing it’s that there’s a range of effective material. Moreover, people got pretty desperate and worked with the assumption something is better than nothing. See https://t.co/oHrRsvA2CS
@FOODFOR05244659 @Jamesbobble The literature review in your thesis really should have come across these: https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPVO
@mindstalk @joeba @CorsIAQ A 1% gap in a properly fitted N95 renders it ineffective. Or, in simpler terms - "masks don't work" https://t.co/Y0dkYNUvN0
RT @RadCentrism: @mc_kinl1 @albinowitz Cloth masks can and do work. But better masks are obviously better: https://t.co/dPb43CGDuK
RT @SwaledaleMutton: @68forever_young @Simonofthe77th @youth_unheard They do indeed. Here you go: https://t.co/sJ6R1hij35
@68forever_young @Simonofthe77th @youth_unheard They do indeed. Here you go: https://t.co/sJ6R1hij35
@Micha99413929 @Mark001001 Że niby nie ma? Serio? https://t.co/ZzlMZ5BjWL https://t.co/JND6RUv2AX A to tylko dwa przykładowe badania
@beth92084 - Wrong, you don't understand primers - Wrong, see https://t.co/DcEF2fKgpF - Wrong, we knew before SARS-CoV-2 they reduce transmission, see https://t.co/cyYD5P93o5 & https://t.co/YaLpvU3OQI - Wrong, it still protects well from severe disease
@TimmyTheTiger3 @Annette_Floyd67 Nobody said masks don’t work, the messaging was that they weren’t necessary early in the pandemic. Then the messaging changed as the situation evolved. Learn the evidence. Don’t parrot nonsense. https://t.co/okFuRYGBZo
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
@erikwhittington @goaloa @ethanclynne These maybe helpful reads- https://t.co/MDAoBSjueM https://t.co/m5oJRMVzoh https://t.co/9H8n6IZrz9
@necro63358790 @MyriamHebuterne C'est complètement faux Lors d'une discussion calme les gouttes de vapeur d'eau sont quand même plus grosse et ne passent pas le maillage https://t.co/r3YbbBi9ak
@BecdachJuan @EPoe187 @saletan Theoretically, yes, by filtering virions inhaled. But fit, leakage, and fabric matters. N95+ = best. https://t.co/dPb43CGDuK
@tech_52 masks work reeeeeeeeeeeeeee https://t.co/3ZmWKnEjlb
@VinceVigier @themislv_vls @MartinBlachier Conseil Avant de faire des affirmations péremptoires, vérifiez ce que vous dites Ça vous évitera de passer pour un idiot https://t.co/r3YbbBi9ak Et une méta analyse https://t.co/nbm8dAe7bP
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
@MojoRisinHigh @DJHale1829 @BrianSMoore3 @msdh I hear that comparison and I'd ask you to dig deaper in your understanding. Sperm is 50 MICROMETERS, Covid is measured in NANOMETERS. Condoms have holes around 7 micrometers (sperms too big). It's apples/oran
@kglarson @6c2e4363f1ad4e4 @WBrettWilson Pretty jpgs. The original tweet is about Terry but you’ve diverted to cloth masks so ok, here y’a go: https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@LexNVenerate @jpm168 @halit16 @atwal_manjit Is it about masks being effective? I thought it was about mandates, and you cared about Canadian people? Because now you’re sounding anti-science. #FluTrucksClan #TruckersForFreedom2022 https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@over_it_all_now @CoCoPleaser @ikebarrows @StefanMychajliw @CNN The particle size of the virus can absolutely fit through the mask. The virus doesn't just float around the air by itself though, its carried in much larger droplets, which masks are much bett
@iKilledKenny_44 This has a lot of good educational material on cloth masks. https://t.co/eqW540mYrg
@PrometheusCHT @ThurstoneMOAR @EPoe187 Other masks work as well. Fit is important. N95+ is best. https://t.co/dPb43CGDuK
Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/iBesXeE0vT
@Hercujerk2 @JT_Grindrod @sinz54 @ChristosArgyrop @EpiEllie They were mostly adequate. Could be better. This is simple. Sorry physics is tough for you. https://t.co/dPb43CGDuK
@mc_kinl1 @albinowitz Cloth masks can and do work. But better masks are obviously better: https://t.co/dPb43CGDuK
RT @Josie19752: @JoeGrowling @BylineTimes @BBCNews #UnMaskUSFORTHEM where is their “High Quality” evidence https://t.co/QVB4aIPz3s
@JoeGrowling @BylineTimes @BBCNews #UnMaskUSFORTHEM where is their “High Quality” evidence https://t.co/QVB4aIPz3s
RT @XmanNYC71: #WearAMask 😷 MASKS WORK! Are they perfect, no, of course not. But they do help, but it has to fit well. Chin warming or dro…
#WearAMask 😷 MASKS WORK! Are they perfect, no, of course not. But they do help, but it has to fit well. Chin warming or drooping masks do not. So get a good one, and wear it well AND #SocialDistancing is essential. And of course : #GetVaccinatedNow htt
@Waiting4MyRuka @CamaroWRX @NickWTOP Here is your N95 science. https://t.co/xng7evbDXq https://t.co/X5p04G2OOe
"...(C)ombinations of cloths such as high threads-per-inch cotton along with silk, chiffon, or flannel can provide broad filtration coverage across both the nanoscale (<300 nm) and micron scale (300 nm to 6 μm) range...electrostatic and physical filteri
@EamonnMcManus10 @lordisthisfree @JuliaHB1 Maybe this one is useful: https://t.co/kYBFYPQsAE
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
@BU_Tweets Boston University, https://t.co/cRTsNwYvOk Four layer silk mask >80 vs. KN-95 mask >95 . Materials Science, location, setting, crowd density, time duration, room air filtration, wearability, durability, comfort, fashion & more…someone
@RikLesel @Pondleg Nope. The masks are highly effective. https://t.co/sgusc6J84G https://t.co/sJ6R1hij35 https://t.co/igtpIYMlNt
@HyperbolicLens Well-fitted masks made of the right cloths work as well as N95 grade High thread-count cotton, with a layer of silk, chiffon or flannel https://t.co/Icu0oJhJZB
@__elDuderino_ @andrewbostom @benshapiro Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/R8ZyD8eLMs https://t.co/oQD1s5OuBX
@VictoriaSanchez @7NewsDC Suggest you check out this scientific study published by the American Chemical Society. It discusses how to make a cloth masks with an electrostatic filter that achieves very high filtering efficiency. https://t.co/tU1uD0EV8H
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
RT @mycatslovemetoo: For the nerds among us. Mask study data. https://t.co/w3yaJCEdiw
For the nerds among us. Mask study data. https://t.co/w3yaJCEdiw
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
@AriJLaaksonen @JesperKivela @ivanpuopolo Kiitettävästi laskee N95:n teho, kun reunan aukko 1% pinta-alasta 12-34% paikkeille. https://t.co/LID2g39ZqP https://t.co/ndpO4tyyf7
@JoshuaPotash N95s are disposable. Tight fitting double-layer cloth masks made of 600 thread count cotton with quilt batting filter are almost as effective and can be reused. https://t.co/dWKVWwCjWH
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
RT @BBN_Ireland: @TomOHanlon17 @ParentsUtdIE Furthermore N95 require trained fit, frequent changing, a 3% gap renders them effectively usel…
@mooonchild85 @QuinntisG @FormerAntivax It's nice that we have experimental data and I don't have to have an opinion. https://t.co/fKCboi8WeK
@bademjanbitch @MrGee54 Mask fit is the key. 600 thread count, 2 layer masks (better with cotton quilt batting filter) that FIT around your nose cheek and chin will help protect you. But fitting your face is the key part - for any type of mask. https://t.
@bademjanbitch 600 thread count double-layer cotton masks that FIT tight around your nose, cheeks, and chin are very effective at *protecting* you. Take a quilt with cotton batting & have someone make masks that fit your face & you will be almost a
If you want to read up yourself; https://t.co/SGcj3oO8Is and https://t.co/rM642rSXzW (the second did a consumer test of retail multi-layer reuseable masks against N95's and found a triple-layer mask with cotton and polyester to be breathable & effectiv
RT @stevenbodzin: It would be really nice if they defined "cloth masks." There is a wide range of efficacies there. https://t.co/W8MQizn4Jj…
@autodicatic #COVID19 Vaccines protect to a high degree against hospitalization and death. Natural immunity is only achieved AFTER the negative sequelae for sicker/older patients. So your first comment is wrong. Masks do filter aerosolized viruses as det
@Asta_de_B @joeyfox85 Study for them. Cloth mask vs N-95 mask debate, during #COVID19 pandemic, has been studied. Cloth mask advocates miss obvious data #N95 masks should be used. N-95 mask designed for 300 nm filtration efficiency function of aerosol part
@allenholub The original study I used to manufacture my own mask when this all started: https://t.co/0EXhSOeKOD As indicated, there's some updated data in newer studies, but the results are basically the same. As a result, I went with a silk inner layer,
@RachelMilliga16 @scattercash1 @burgsey2 @ukcolumn @TwitterSupport We knew long before SARS-CoV-2 arose that face masks are effective in reducing the outbound transmission of respiratory viruses. https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t
RT @MrWinslowRH: With some of the recent change in guidance about which masks people should be wearing, I just wanted to share some researc…
With some of the recent change in guidance about which masks people should be wearing, I just wanted to share some research about why fit and filtering matters. https://t.co/ZkTiGIclmK https://t.co/9Zq1RY4rMo
@CindyCoops @paul_vermehren @karenmulter @303DnB @BMeiselas @rosierifka Why are you actively lying Cindy? What’s your agenda? https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@Boomieleaks They don't "barely even do anything." But many of us absolutely have been saying that since early 2020. https://t.co/YGRqHDXgKD
@EPoe187 @aaronsibarium @linseymarr Even not-so-great masks filter effectively. What becomes most important, depending on the situation, is seal/fit: https://t.co/YGRqHDXgKD
RT @lindaschaos: @benking01 @BBCRadio4 @halfon4harlowMP Here's some useful research into cloth masks https://t.co/WuXkQ8H1fb
@recj50 @MurgoloV @DaveKozlowski @FoxNews So a solid can’t be smaller than a gas? These guys, you know scientists, claim otherwise. You are/were wrong. https://t.co/FoN0IhqCUJ
@benking01 @BBCRadio4 @halfon4harlowMP Here's some useful research into cloth masks https://t.co/WuXkQ8H1fb
@theREALMJpain @nvt3gr8 @bestdianeever @Linknewspaper You really want to convince people you’ve taken advanced science classes with this crap? https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
RT @provaxdocs: Ok docs, putting my first question out to you. I'm hearing a lot of recommendations for N95 or bust. This study says tw…
@_AyoJon @chris24schwarz @rweingarten BOTTOM LEFT, BLIND AND LAZY https://t.co/j7KO7on2Rt
RT @provaxdocs: Ok docs, putting my first question out to you. I'm hearing a lot of recommendations for N95 or bust. This study says tw…
Ok docs, putting my first question out to you. I'm hearing a lot of recommendations for N95 or bust. This study says two layers of 600 thread count cotton captures 82% of particles < 300 microns vs 85% for a N95. Is this data superceded or flawed?
@Literature_Lady I rediscovered this article today. I'd forgotten thar silk has electrostatic properties, so I may add a layer ... https://t.co/KHGbbvbUiN
@isth1srealL1fe @theSGM4 @Philiponholiday @MissMia1988 @patvel18 We knew masks are effective in reducing outbound transmission of respiratory viruses before Covid came along. https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://