@Chakopups @chrysha22 @JasonBik @FLSurgeonGen @TracyBethHoeg You could always read a peer reviewed paper from experts that know what they are talking about rather than claiming embalmers peer review anything 😂🤣🤡 https://t.co/eM4BLoHh7X
RT @MakalMakal: A follow-up for anyone interested in the science behind filtration efficiencies: https://t.co/2X50yg6b2R
@Dan__Stevens Clearly rubbish. See these papers for example: https://t.co/cyYD5OS0m5 https://t.co/YaLpvUlY4Q https://t.co/FZHVCCbtlr https://t.co/wOwaiQnHO7 https://t.co/CuqzAXkXiB https://t.co/p1UjSPonLm https://t.co/85XbVtnqY8 https://t.co/YQzxFu
@aaronharris @CQueenbeejdl @dumplingdesirer @SherriPriestman @obliocactus @awgaffney @ENirenberg In laboratory conditions. With a perfect seal. For particles around 300 nm in size. How small of a gap renders the effectiveness down to 'uneffective'? What
@juneslater17 Proving again that you’re ignorant on most issues. As the research states otherwise https://t.co/eM4BLoHh7X
@yvon_l @Rudy_San_Rudy @Patrickdery La filtration n'est pas juste mécanique, elle est électrostatique. Bref même si les perforations sont vraiment plus grosses que les virus, le ratio surface/volume est tellement grand que les virus/particules s'y collent
@grace5421 @canjetsfan @Arbagedon7 @natecallens @LogicalMD33 @TRyanGregory Why are you lying? https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
@LovemycountrySd @GatvolVrou @staffposting @Robbie_J @kinsellawarren “Useless” with zero source to back up your claim - back it up or shut it https://t.co/JJZieqK8Fd
@M_A_Kowalchuk @SpencerFernando You pays you to lie? https://t.co/JJZier2hTl
RT @WeingartenDE: Die #Studie "#Aerosol #Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth #Masks" belegte, das #Baumwolle,…
@crwequine Trick question - it has been studied. Correct answer is 1% Hence the claim "mask dont work" is accurate statement. The theoretical properties of a respirator are invalid as the proper application of a mask is unreasonable and not realized in
@komradeperogie Here's another leftist that thinks they understand the subject https://t.co/6ryaIIjWi3
@Martressa8 @MarkC07568136 @Kam_Bach @Laurier Why are you lying? Who pays you? https://t.co/JJZier2hTl
@PickEmLegend @xpaulso @Whe59068595Lisa @Resist_05 Well-fitted masks made of the right cloths work as well as N95 grade High thread-count cotton, with a layer of silk, chiffon or flannel https://t.co/Icu0oJzTdJ
@TrueCanadian64 @UncleScorp @ryangerritsen Why are you lying? Who pays you to spread malicious intent? https://t.co/JJZier2hTl
@sunmead @DanNickel @CoryBMorgan Why are you lying? Who pays you? https://t.co/JJZier2hTl
@JefferysSteven @SurelyHolmes @CoryBMorgan Why are you lying? https://t.co/JJZier2hTl
@ldavidjoiner @Mw_ottawa What’s wrong with you?? https://t.co/JJZier2hTl
@F125AXer @JamieSale @SJWilliams123 Why are you lying? https://t.co/JJZieqK8Fd
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
@Blue_Maize87 @LeopoldVI @VLo_CA @PostOpinions @kathleenparker https://t.co/yFekJVsQtP long story short, based on pore size and water adhesion / electrostatics of barriers, they can range from stupid effective to stupid ineffective. silk / small meshs are
@HermionesFury @PCAdams1950 @Inadarkwood At best that one (1) surgeon has made case that a better cloth is required, not that "cloths" don't work. Efficiencies in types of cloths vary. https://t.co/jG92foRuSv
RT @Marc_Montana: @drlizzieskinner Bro, unless you have coughing fits or Tuberculosis with sputum, masks do nothing for Covid, the size of…
RT @Marc_Montana: @drlizzieskinner Bro, unless you have coughing fits or Tuberculosis with sputum, masks do nothing for Covid, the size of…
@CRBoxKits The study in question. https://t.co/XJgy6df9nu
@MelsyJ @BoudicaCentrica @Hol_Mist Allow me to add more to the reading list. https://t.co/cyYD5P93o5 https://t.co/YaLpvU3OQI https://t.co/FZHVCBTk7j https://t.co/wOwaiQ5yzZ https://t.co/CuqzAX2O4t https://t.co/p1UjSPFqNm https://t.co/85XbVt5hK0 htt
@protakill @apandaliveshere @SteveGoffman @yashar Your science? Any sources beyond your echo chamber? https://t.co/JJZier2hTl
@protakill @RabelaisBleu Really? Back to that? https://t.co/JJZier2hTl
@LaurieM40848142 @strikethirteen @ShaneAKAProp @Mistorca @JamesMelville Not a very good surgeon as the research states otherwise https://t.co/eM4BLoHh7X
@Redrake22Ruth @GemJimmythe @slingsingapore @_ashawndabney How many studies would you like me to post? https://t.co/OF2rm0HIsv
@GemJimmythe @Redrake22Ruth @slingsingapore @_ashawndabney Here's a study that will help explain all of this to you. Now, it is an academic paper, so, you may not be able to get through all of it. Pretend you're working on research for an actual MSc. (And
RT @walks_sc: @FatalFibers @hansel21_ @Ali_CV_Guru @JohnBoweActor We have known masks are effective in reducing outbound transmission of re…
RT @walks_sc: @FatalFibers @hansel21_ @Ali_CV_Guru @JohnBoweActor We have known masks are effective in reducing outbound transmission of re…
RT @walks_sc: @FatalFibers @hansel21_ @Ali_CV_Guru @JohnBoweActor We have known masks are effective in reducing outbound transmission of re…
@FatalFibers @hansel21_ @Ali_CV_Guru @JohnBoweActor We have known masks are effective in reducing outbound transmission of respiratory viruses for many years! https://t.co/cyYD5P93o5 https://t.co/YaLpvU3OQI https://t.co/FZHVCBTk7j https://t.co/CuqzAX2O
@PerezHilton If you disagree with him, you should probably read more! https://t.co/nFAqchvCA4
RT @WeingartenDE: Die #Studie "#Aerosol #Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth #Masks" belegte, das #Baumwolle,…
@Factsination_ @lisa_iannattone So everyone with a high medical degree volunteers? Works for free? Works for minimum wage? You for communism all of a sudden? Oh and here you go https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@following_with @AndrewDeathFlag @Laughing_Lupe @lisa_iannattone This again? 🤦🏼♀️ https://t.co/JJZier2hTl
@jamesamcgee @GarySingerMD Efficiency drops to 12-34% for n95 depending on size of respiratory particles. A 3.2% gap drops surgical masks efficiency to ~Zero. https://t.co/ycClsUZxBm Cloth masks merely trapped pathogens and hindered child development. Unl
@bagger_returns @josegomezmontes @nickytgray2 @SteveBarclay We are discussing masks, not specific types of masks. But yeah, I'm pretty sure that surgical masks do have under 100 nm holes. https://t.co/JIDpMd6XKW
@bagger_returns @josegomezmontes @LilScalps @nickytgray2 @SteveBarclay Not exactly. Mask holes actually are too small to let through Sars-Cov-2, so it would be more like a fly and those fly nets that keep them out of windows that I forgot the name of. htt
@NAChristakis @BrianEdwardMKE @CJoelBridge @LeftTheCoast OSHA, the military, CDC used to recognize that masking without engineering controls was useless. A mask is good for buying time while making distance between you and the pathogen. Mechanistic studies
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
@kate_freedomer @RealAndyLeeShow Your assumption is incorrect. Aerosol science actually says otherwise. Even if it helps to minimize viral dispersion why would you not? If you have an infection simply wear a mask, and limit your interaction with others, no
@yeahnaa333 @ltg1810 @angiebUK @Fiona_M_Russell @RitaPanahi I also can't wait, holding two degrees on the subject. Oh, and masks work. https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAX
@PaulKirvan If you knew how to read properly, you would see the link I gave contained references to many peer reviewed articles on covid-19 and cloth masks. https://t.co/IXj7Hpt0u0 Is one example contained in the references. Trumpers suck at science.
RT @Marc_Montana: @sharkguy726x2 Stop shopping where they ask for one! Any restaurant, mall, store that asks for one I leave and never retu…
RT @Marc_Montana: @sharkguy726x2 Stop shopping where they ask for one! Any restaurant, mall, store that asks for one I leave and never retu…
@sharkguy726x2 Stop shopping where they ask for one! Any restaurant, mall, store that asks for one I leave and never return! https://t.co/qv8a0PVXAB
@GigaBeers Masks don't stop covid here's your Science! https://t.co/bmqMPzsfbc
@407MarisaL80 @Calluna232 @TorontoStar Lol. Masks are not kitchen colanders. Even cheap blue masks filter using electrostatic filtration. N95s/kn95s do as well. However, even the worst mask (cotton, homemade) catches between 80-90% of virus particles.
@truth4allofus @Pepperb39393585 @JohnKolb2 @SteveDeaceShow More data that shows you’re wrong! https://t.co/QhkBovWp5r
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
@mindstalk @tylerblack32 Which of the 5 sources on that chart are wrong? Gaps reduce mask efficiency to nothing https://t.co/GkluzJl3B4 The OSHA chart? We use masking as the last/worst for any dangerous job site. Elimination of/isolation from particulate
@whstancil A shot that needed to be re-defined and then finding out had only a 12% efficacy is NOT a vaccine! Even the Flu Shot has a 65% efficacy and is NOT a vaccine. Tetanus Vaccine is a vax, it prevents Tetanus for 7 years! As for masks, you need to
@MarGree42 @MelsyJ @matthewdmarsden Meanwhile, in more up to date science.... https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPVO https://t.co/85XbVtmT8A ht
@RMSRimutaka @ElMystico @efan78 @matthewdmarsden https://t.co/LqNjj8IsNB https://t.co/Mp9Ky8kmQc Masks reduce transmission…
@Bejabbers1 @zanfr You should then also be able to understand that many common fabrics have electrostatic filtration. https://t.co/dPb43CGDuK
@froggy_terries @strife_db_knot @ggreenwald @emo_garfield420 @annakhachiyan @AmandaMilius “Draconian lockdowns”? Stop living in fear of virus mitigation, Heracles. Let others live their lives safely away from your libertarian spews. You’ll still be okay I
3/ Sources #2 (Version#1 had 1 wrong link) 1.Filtrations Efficiency Layering Masks -AAPR https://t.co/yyG9KJ58a0 2. Comparison Performance Metrics Cloth Face Masks- NIH https://t.co/nrhEAh53O7 3. Overview Filtration Efficiency Masks -Science Direct http
@ThelmaMcGillic1 Wrong. 3/ Sources 1.Filtrations Efficiency of Layering Masks -AAPR https://t.co/yyG9KJ58a0 2. An Overview of Filtration Efficiency through Masks -Science Direct https://t.co/VPGgok1n17 3. A Comparison of performance metrics for cloth fac
@JuliaHB1 So you actually dismiss the research that states otherwise in favour of your ill informed opinion https://t.co/eM4BLoGJip
@ScarlybooILuvU @TreverBoyce705 @bobscartoons Eh? Anything is better than nothing https://t.co/YGA837kiix
@MichaelScimeca4 @bennyjohnson "We find that cotton, natural silk, and chiffon can provide good protection, typically above 50% in the entire 10 nm (0.01 micron) to 6.0 micron range, provided they have a tight weave." -National Center for Biotechnology Inf
@T0nbridgewells @MHKiwi @IndependentSage @VickiGSP And when you get through that one, here's another one for you. https://t.co/3TZMg7ov90
@ianmSC Masks do nothing! https://t.co/9yiYfK6tUT
@mae1968 @CartlandDavid We know masks are effective in reducing outbound transmission of respiratory viruses! https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPVO h
@stfupdonny @artyoan @matthewstoller Efficacy of all masks drops with a 1 percent gap. https://t.co/2xkucRZSYH Masks must be fitted and combined with other measures: https://t.co/rsYO0ihaGj
@Eliesje3 @CarolienJansen9 ... (https://t.co/j3ekrVp9bc). Wel weten we dat de populaire chirurgische maskers minder effectief zijn vanwege de slechte pasvorm. FFP2 maskers daarentegen zijn betaalbaar, herbruikbaar, effectief en goed te dragen.
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…