The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Differential effects of nanoselenium doping on healthy and cancerous osteoblasts in coculture on titanium
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, May 2010
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s7289 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Phong A Tran, Love Sarin, Robert H Hurt, Thomas J Webster |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 46 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 26% |
Researcher | 5 | 11% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 10 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 6 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 13% |
Engineering | 5 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 17% |
Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,835,465
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#393
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,927
of 104,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them