↓ Skip to main content

ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination prevents SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in rhesus macaques

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 100,251)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
357 Mendeley
Title
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination prevents SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in rhesus macaques
Published in
bioRxiv, May 2020
DOI 10.1101/2020.05.13.093195
Pubmed ID
Authors

van Doremalen, Neeltje, Lambe, Teresa, Spencer, Alexandra, Belij-Rammerstorfer, Sandra, Purushotham, Jyothi N., Port, Julia R., Avanzato, Victoria, Bushmaker, Trenton, Flaxman, Amy, Ulaszewska, Marta, Feldmann, Friederike, Allen, Elizabeth R., Sharpe, Hannah, Schulz, Jonathan, Holbrook, Myndi, Okumura, Atsushi, Meade-White, Kimberly, Pérez-Pérez, Lizzette, Bissett, Cameron, Gilbride, Ciaran, Williamson, Brandi N., Rosenke, Rebecca, Long, Dan, Ishwarbhai, Alka, Kailath, Reshma, Rose, Louisa, Morris, Susan, Powers, Claire, Lovaglio, Jamie, Hanley, Patrick W., Scott, Dana, Saturday, Greg, de Wit, Emmie, Gilbert, Sarah C., Munster, Vincent J.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9,220 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 357 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 65 18%
Student > Bachelor 56 16%
Student > Master 42 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 11%
Other 23 6%
Other 64 18%
Unknown 68 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 79 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 52 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 5%
Other 57 16%
Unknown 79 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4348. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2020.
All research outputs
#370
of 16,094,382 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#6
of 100,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89
of 283,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#3
of 8,297 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,094,382 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8,297 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.