@deSunShineBand 5) De onder 3) genoemde link geeft nog een leugen weer onder What is comirnatyand what is it used for. Bevat geen virus.. nee. kijk even hier dan: https://t.co/FjpO3EjlKH Abstract, 2e alinea en klik even op de blauwe kreet.. ben ik benieuwd
@Simon_News2UK @MarkWar16520311 And here’s animal tests in non-human primates Pfizer: https://t.co/RoqAshLb0p Moderna: https://t.co/TOWkVQfcos J&J: https://t.co/NKA04YSAoW AstraZeneca: https://t.co/T22BIRvylX
@veen_els Wat nou als er SARS-CoV-2 in die prikken zit? Zoek eens op ChAdOx1 en (YP_009724390.1)? kom je hier uit: https://t.co/FjpO3EjlKH Zie onder Abstract tweede Alinea. (klik op de blauwe letters). @CarineKnapen @john_bumblebee @CeesCees72 Er was GEEN
@MeasslainteIE @SwaledaleMutton They passed animal testing just fine
@statonomic @cantsuicideus @stkirsch @SwaledaleMutton Sorry this one. The others I sent you before address reduction in transmission
@OskeeOckham2 @Puppieskitts @HeyNurseKat @NugsL Is the only thing you are good at lying? Here is animal testing for the Covid vaccines: Pfizer: https://t.co/RoqAshLb0p Moderna: https://t.co/TOWkVQfcos J&J: https://t.co/NKA04YSAoW AstraZeneca: https://t
@PvanHouwelingen @Denachtzuster1 ... en zoönose te versterken? Is het niet juist de bedoeling dat dat niet kan? Ow.... vandaar dat er een gemanipuleerd Adeno-virus in de spuiten zat. ChAdOx1- gemaakt van deze formule (YP_009724390.1) Abstract, tweede aline
@CarineKnapen Punt is dat de titel gelijk heeft, wrang maar waar. Alleen hoort het SARS-CoV-2 te zijn, want dat zit er namelijk in (Adeno virus omgezet in Chadox1: https://t.co/FjpO3EjlKH Zie tweede Alinea en dan deze kreet (YP_009724390.1), Klik erop en j
@john_bumblebee @spacema09104056 @MarionKoopmans @mkeulemans Het virus is gewoon in het laboratorium gefabriceerd: https://t.co/FjpO3EjlKH Zie tweede alinea. Als je op de blauwe kreet (YP_009724390.1) klikt, dankom je uit op een pagina waar SARS-CoV-2 staa
アカゲ🐵DNA💉→💉後の中和抗体力価がコロナ攻撃に対する防御と相関 https://t.co/ex7dvGmmXq 体液性・細胞性免疫応答は💉誘発性の感染防御と関連 https://t.co/1Pj14Rz3hC コロナ自然感染はアカゲ🐵再感染を防ぐ https://t.co/DNNXeSPO7A 中和抗体が🦠中和の適切な代用として機能する可能性ありと示唆
@Gramaton5 Eine dieser belegten Täuschung ist: Der Impfstoff verhindert bei Rhesus-Affen schwere Lungenentzündungen als Erfolg der PhaseI/II Zwischenauswertung, so dass dadurch parallel bereits auf die Studie mit menschlichen Probanden verführt umgestiegen
@SpiritualAnark @jasonwoody Ah yes coronanews vs actual animal testing data 😂
@SpiritualAnark @jasonwoody Did you even look?
@SpiritualAnark @jasonwoody Why are you lying over and over?
@verity_france Les charges virales avaient été étudiées chez les macaques dès mai 2020 ... "no difference in viral load in nose swabs was found on any days between vaccinated and control animals" https://t.co/aZipb227X8 https://t.co/aBs6KEt7R6
@grandpappa_john @bambi_vasquez @DrJamesOlsson Why do you lie? It didn’t kill the animals
@SkipJackAJ @Mr_Wonderful_89 @CHSmith1013 @TheFreds He also lied about animal testing and ADE
@KirWasHere1235 @PadenShorey @JustinTrudeau Your source lied to the teeth. It lied that past vaccines were compared with absolute risk vs relative, lied about no animal testing and many many other issues. Learn to check the validity of sources
@StoneyBrownRad @Areyoufos @psychotherapuss @okMatthewL @PierreKory Not true. They only detected the challenge viral RNA, not replication. They were TRYING to infect them. My anecdotes suggest the opposite. Difference is, I’d never suggest my anecdotes w
@Christi16529728 @ZHU_DE @RSSol64860963 @Xixonto1 Argumento de autoridad, no? Le crees a ciegas porque tiene más títulos? Pues ya te he demostrado que tener más títulos no es sinónimo de decir la verdad. https://t.co/pvRzobEb8w
@Christi16529728 @ZHU_DE @RSSol64860963 @Xixonto1 Bueno, pues como la Dra Acevedo dice que las vacunas de vector viral se saltaron las pruebas preclínicos en animales, aquí están: https://t.co/Jp1k8MGxUL
RT @FraiseAdam: @TheFreds If you had the faintest idea about science you wouldn't just believe a Daily Mail article but find the original p…
RT @FraiseAdam: @TheFreds If you had the faintest idea about science you wouldn't just believe a Daily Mail article but find the original p…
And this PDF file from Biorvix has the the usual suspects connected. https://t.co/9lIfvM3VF0
@Madison46108374 @love4Aimsey @GovCanHealth Animal trial for Pfizer: https://t.co/Dh9CQqCi18 For Moderna: https://t.co/rwcaMJmb6r For J&J: https://t.co/aRiCAdjoRv For AZ: https://t.co/fVfyaw4RT0
@letsgetitbetter @schnorberto @benonwine No they weren't. But they were still pushed as if they did. It's called malinformation. Similar to disinformation & misinformation. https://t.co/PEPc18OSXv https://t.co/FQD23PSUqL
@trymybest18 @schnorberto @benonwine You're conflating design with one type of assessment of the synthesised product. Failure to prevent transmission was flagged in the scientific literature yet the "shareholders" still claimed >94% efficacy. E.g. Oxfo
@NotHammerNation @aginnt https://t.co/c7KA9AxC3Y “Viral gRNA was detected in nose swabs from all animals and no difference in viral load in nose swabs was found on any days between vaccinated and control animals.”This study from 5/2020 shows evidence that
RT @Ananda10149510: @Pete_Finnegan @NickHudsonCT @ianmSC https://t.co/c7KA9AxC3Y “Viral gRNA was detected in nose swabs from all animals an…
@omotforest @Pete_Finnegan @NickHudsonCT @ianmSC https://t.co/c7KA9AxC3Y “Viral gRNA was detected in nose swabs from all animals and no difference in viral load in nose swabs was found on any days between vaccinated and control animals.”This study from 5/2
@Pete_Finnegan @NickHudsonCT @ianmSC https://t.co/c7KA9AxC3Y “Viral gRNA was detected in nose swabs from all animals and no difference in viral load in nose swabs was found on any days between vaccinated and control animals.”This study from 5/2020 shows ev
@SammyG_MD https://t.co/c7KA9AxC3Y “Viral gRNA was detected in nose swabs from all animals and no difference in viral load in nose swabs was found on any days between vaccinated and control animals.”This study from 5/2020 shows evidence that vax doesn’t pr
@ClareCraigPath https://t.co/c7KA9AxC3Y “Viral gRNA was detected in nose swabs from all animals and no difference in viral load in nose swabs was found on any days between vaccinated and control animals.”This study from 5/2020 shows evidence that vax never
@LCHF_Matt @DentePresi @StevePriceMedia @AusTodayListnr Right... and this study using mice and rhesus monkeys (which don't tend to get very sick from the virus) shows NO difference in transmission (viral shedding). https://t.co/QIdUGaX2sG
@EricYatesUk No part of that is correct. https://t.co/Y34l05BwA1 https://t.co/979l0KRsTw https://t.co/8pAW6f8QO8 https://t.co/iaJb5HoX3t https://t.co/XnuDGXpvtO
@DeaconSuxx @ZlatkoKovach @jacobcabe Not according to AstraZ's study... No difference in "viral shedding" between immunized and un-immunized mice and monkeys. humans are primates. https://t.co/QIdUGaX2sG
@Carrotsandpars1 @indepdubnrth You said there were no Covid animal trial results published. This is an animal trial results published. More trials linked from this tweet... https://t.co/OYf8etWb2m
@RaraaSoulSiStar @ProfPCDoherty Animal trials were not skipped: https://t.co/Y34l05BwA1 https://t.co/8pAW6f8QO8 https://t.co/iaJb5HoX3t https://t.co/979l0KRsTw https://t.co/WZBZiYbpqe
@Bestlaydee @heyflower80 What's this? https://t.co/uCcS0VIwqI
@bxdray @KeithOlbermann Have you read ANY of the vax research? 🤷🏽♀️ The vax doesn’t protect you. Even the vax manufactures say that on their vax inserts. As a doctor and published on vax research, I’d urge you to read the research. Here’s a paper to g
RT @Nachtzuster2: @chrisklomp @bont26958011 @martinhoof @willemwaanzin 16/5/20 - Werkt het middel van AstraZeneca op apen? Alle gevaccineer…
@CWhalen3 @jonwaldron @ProfPCDoherty That would be preclinical and they were done. https://t.co/979l0KRsTw https://t.co/Y34l05BwA1 https://t.co/iaJb5HoX3t https://t.co/WZBZiYbpqe https://t.co/8pAW6f8QO8
@MayaSmi60344239 @DJahn66 @CPCDouches @21WIRE Animal studies are publicly available, and not hard to find. +https://t.co/ho0fRSUsH5 +https://t.co/llXjYLRENk +https://t.co/bDK0XKntOK +https://t.co/lEtnAqKssq +https://t.co/8e09MI1MU6 No offense, but if u un
RT @wolfie_smythe: @Stan2415loveu From the preprint of the AZ Vax research, SAGE members knew about this right from the start. https://t.c…
@Stan2415loveu From the preprint of the AZ Vax research, SAGE members knew about this right from the start. https://t.co/VHRDgC8Fpw https://t.co/2pXeQ0TnJF
RT @Ananda10149510: @RWMaloneMD "Viral gRNA was detected in nose swabs from all animals and no difference in viral load in nose swabs was f…
@RWMaloneMD "Viral gRNA was detected in nose swabs from all animals and no difference in viral load in nose swabs was found on any days between vaccinated and control animals (Figure 3c)." Line 103-105, Figure 3c Link: https://t.co/iqkqcFr7O9
@SamuelPeeps9 @davidjthunder It was clearly stated in the research paper way back in May 2020. https://t.co/VHRDgC8Fpw
RT @SeeVessel: COVID vaccine contains ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or ChAdOx1 GFP is evidenced to be "a control vaccine expressing green fluorescent pro…
@gibu02 @justincbzz @MarcoMNYC @PeterZeihan "Viral gRNA was detected in nose swabs from all animals and no difference in viral load in nose swabs was found on any days between vaccinated and control animals." https://t.co/C8KwoH6wV0 Oxford/Astra Zeneca i
@Buenrollo13 Estudio de la universidad de Oxford y AstraZeneca de la vacuna ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 en ratones y primates no humanos: https://t.co/uFT3IAtBUk
RT @laurenmill3r93: @leew2030 @Fizz_og Here are the Studies for all of the Vaccines Moderna +https://t.co/ho0fRSUsH5 Pfizer / BioNtech +ht…
@leew2030 @Fizz_og Here are the Studies for all of the Vaccines Moderna +https://t.co/ho0fRSUsH5 Pfizer / BioNtech +https://t.co/llXjYLRENk J&J +https://t.co/bDK0XKntOK Oxford / AZ +https://t.co/lEtnAqKssq NovaVax +https://t.co/8e09MI1MU6 Hope this h
This is the same @K_Fletcher_MP that a couple of days ago praised the standing ovation at Wimbledon for the Gilbert lab over the AZ vaccine development. (https://t.co/dEXgkVqJgH) Do check out the preprint. Should some of them be "heading home"? https://t
@NorthernGather2 @SwaledaleMutton @OffGuardian0 Different virus, different vaccine technologies, different cellular immune responses. The current vaccines have all undergone preclinical animal testing (including in mice & NHPs). Moderna: https://t.co
@Ky68251941 @lucindasanscha1 @randyhillier Here is a non-peer reviewed AstraZeneca paper. https://t.co/aose7ecczC
@amigo_astro @paeonia79659331 @jokertheef @ChanasitJonas Der Link zur Studie, den primum non nocere gepostet hat ist übrigens im Artikel. https://t.co/HzGnblkKXP
A Summary Statement: Animals vaccinated with an intramuscular(IM) vector AZ-Oxford vaccine ALL GOT INFECTED when challenged with SARS-CoV-2. ALL animals shed virus. But there was less virus than in controls. Macaques had no pneumonia. = IM vaccines might p
RT @ENirenberg: @StompemAll @doritmi Really? What do you call these? https://t.co/Y34l05BwA1 https://t.co/979l0KRsTw https://t.co/8pAW6f8QO…
@StompemAll @doritmi Really? What do you call these? https://t.co/Y34l05BwA1 https://t.co/979l0KRsTw https://t.co/8pAW6f8QO8 https://t.co/iaJb5HoX3t https://t.co/WZBZiYbpqe
"We observed a significantly reduced viral load in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and respiratory tract tissue of vaccinated animals challenged with SARS-CoV-2 compared with control animals, and no pneumonia was observed in vaccinated rhesus macaques." https
@PaulWhitton1 @DannyDa58901615 @GustikPiestany @21WIRE @NHSuk https://t.co/S8J5vbpiSx https://t.co/Dra2Hr549c https://t.co/QXHr1oIWI2 https://t.co/sWmOGfJy85 Question : do you think it's possible to release a drug to market without animal testing?
@Donzaliaz @ClareCraigPath @2020Smiles Strange I can find the results of a completed study here then. I can find more too if you like? https://t.co/tomCca0V2z
@smsmith416 @GeorgeMoots @EthanStarr45 Animal studies were conducted Moderna +https://t.co/ho0fRSUsH5 Pfizer +https://t.co/llXjYLRENk J%J +https://t.co/bDK0XKntOK Oxford +https://t.co/lEtnAqKssq They are Vaccines +https://t.co/qJtU0pBVUY +https://t.co/jf8
RT @VeritasTXgem: published in the journal Nature says the vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 used T-Rex 293 HEK cells in the virus propagation stage.…
@unguenta @BeardyClam @johnthefocuser https://t.co/pOtg5E9V7l The actual paper, took a few minutes to track it down
@Cyclowarrior @reload14523749 This is what I was looking for thanks ‘Importantly, no evidence of immune-enhanced disease following viral challenge in vaccinated animals was observed’ https://t.co/krFL5ARkfk
@GazouLisa @JuvenileBluster @FlaPatriotMom @JennaEllisEsq @naomirwolf several other people have done so already and i won't be repeating their work. https://t.co/Kebdzl4T4C
@Crissmosp @ViviGomezBello1 @meganoticiascl Moderna https://t.co/OO3AJsu7qX Pfizer https://t.co/iGuRwfjBsG Jansen https://t.co/QZ771fdRSC Astrazeneca https://t.co/sbNO018Bhs Novavax https://t.co/QSrqLFUBHq
RT @dense_evi: @bunni7572 And bc someone says so, you believe it? I'm not a scientist, I'm not involved with pharma. I am involved with g…
@CheshireCat_37 @DanjeeHeals @AngelStar254 Google scholar is your friend. And this guy did it for you. https://t.co/EiFwP76ts7
@bunni7572 And bc someone says so, you believe it? I'm not a scientist, I'm not involved with pharma. I am involved with governance. Which means checking. Everything. https://t.co/EiFwP76ts7
@Narsil01 @TakethatCt @AgainstKookery They didn’t skip animal testing. It appears you skipped fact checking and believed whatever source told you that animal testing had been skipped Covid vaccine animal trials Oxford/AZ https://t.co/tasqVa4OoH Moderna ht
@lippybynature @eveforamerica @brightlibra Because here's the document that includes the actual cell strain, HEK 293, and the fact that it's filtered out from the vaccine. MRC-5 is not the cell strain used https://t.co/BKrHOUfw2m
@hecid @LuisServinG @STaboadaMx @En_laDelValle @AstraZeneca @EMA_News @opsoms @GobCDMX @SSalud_mx @GobiernoMX @LaJornada @AlcaldiaAO El estudio detallado de Astrazeneca que no pasó prueba en Monos, para que las personas se informen antes de meterse algo a
@CelloBellaClara AZ "We observed a significantly reduced viral load in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and respiratory tract tissue of vaccinated animals challenged with SARS-CoV-2 compared with control animals, and no pneumonia was observed in vaccinated rhe
@photocanvaspro @fact_covid @Telegraph DNA isn’t changed by mRNA and the vaccines were tested on animals. Eg https://t.co/zT6xuYKxpV
@lordchewy89 @nportocarero @LaymansScience @Kevin_McKernan @dnatured @sense_strand @dremmanuelgold2 @60CarltonSt @dantrimont @ujualnarayan @theotherphilipp @c_drosten really? these animals got pneumonia unless they were vaccinated. https://t.co/tRGbpEJSYv
The preprint “ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination prevent…” (https://t.co/z3kxFNLMIk) has been reviewed by automated tools, find results here: https://t.co/BFdpfbGmOa. We detected 3 of 6 rigor criteria, 8 resources, open data, potentially misleading graphs, and no
@DrNeeltje Then how come viral RNA(same viral load) was detected in nose of vaccinated and control monkeys? Can you comment? https://t.co/zGbRXU5w6C https://t.co/Q14H9XhAtR
@FutureGhost14 @10DowningStreet The Oxford/AZ official paper mentions in passing that they checked for ADE (they phrase it differently though) and they 'conclude' there isn't any, despite euthanising animals after only 7 days. Do you know if Pfizer say any
All vaccinated monkeys treated with the #Oxfordvaccine became infected when challenged. There was no difference in the amount of viral RNA detected in various sites in the vaccinated monkeys as compared to the unvaccinated animals. https://t.co/Nw38u6jzO
@LibertyLins @SharpieDj @LynnBrittney2 Also 6 rhesus macaques in 2020 - line 67 https://t.co/TXq9nSwivj
@Mohamme90939901 They did test the Astrazeneca vaccine in challenge trials on macaque monkeys. They noted an upregulation of Interferon gamma. This is associated with the cytokine storms that have blighted previous attempts to develop a SARS vaccine. http
RT @MonsieurQFB: Estudio Preclínico y funcionamiento de ChAdOx1 nCov (Vacuna Oxford-AstraZeneca) https://t.co/Jc2F0jqkBh
Estudio Preclínico y funcionamiento de ChAdOx1 nCov (Vacuna Oxford-AstraZeneca) https://t.co/Jc2F0jqkBh
@h_i_g_s_c_h @Chrissip81 Das ist auch exakt das was man im affenmodell gesehen hat. virusreplikation in den oberen atemwegen und vollständiger schutz der Lunge selbst bei extrem hohen infektionsdosen https://t.co/GlIaS3v5tj