↓ Skip to main content

Notice of Retraction: Effectiveness of Surgical and Cotton Masks in Blocking SARS-CoV-2

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Internal Medicine, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 11,920)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
2785 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Notice of Retraction: Effectiveness of Surgical and Cotton Masks in Blocking SARS-CoV-2
Published in
Annals of Internal Medicine, July 2020
DOI 10.7326/l20-0745
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seongman Bae, Min-Chul Kim, Ji Yeun Kim, Hye-Hee Cha, Joon Seo Lim, Jiwon Jung, Min-Jae Kim, Dong Kyu Oh, Mi-Kyung Lee, Seong-Ho Choi, Minki Sung, Sang-Bum Hong, Jin-Won Chung, Sung-Han Kim

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,785 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 63%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1501. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,337
of 16,638,522 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Internal Medicine
#37
of 11,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#338
of 291,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Internal Medicine
#5
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,638,522 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.