↓ Skip to main content

Problem solving therapy (PST) tailored for intimate partner violence (IPV) versus standard PST and enhanced usual care for pregnant women experiencing IPV in rural Ethiopia: protocol for a randomised…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Problem solving therapy (PST) tailored for intimate partner violence (IPV) versus standard PST and enhanced usual care for pregnant women experiencing IPV in rural Ethiopia: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial
Published in
Trials, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13063-020-04331-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roxanne C. Keynejad, Tesera Bitew, Katherine Sorsdahl, Bronwyn Myers, Simone Honikman, Girmay Medhin, Negussie Deyessa, Nick Sevdalis, Wietse A. Tol, Louise Howard, Charlotte Hanlon

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 272 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Researcher 21 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 4%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 110 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 10%
Social Sciences 17 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 119 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,525,593
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#888
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,075
of 435,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#16
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.