↓ Skip to main content

Exercise for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
37 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
42 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
369 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004366.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rimer, Jane, Dwan, Kerry, Lawlor, Debbie A, Greig, Carolyn A, McMurdo, Marion, Morley, Wendy, Mead, Gillian E, Jane Rimer, Kerry Dwan, Debbie A Lawlor, Carolyn A Greig, Marion McMurdo, Wendy Morley, Gillian E Mead

Abstract

Depression is a common and important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Depression is commonly treated with antidepressants and/or psychotherapy, but some people may prefer alternative approaches such as exercise. There are a number of theoretical reasons why exercise may improve depression. This is an update of an earlier review first published in 2009.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 277 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 60 21%
Student > Master 42 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 10%
Researcher 26 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 67 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 22%
Psychology 49 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 9%
Sports and Recreations 21 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 4%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 79 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 360. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2023.
All research outputs
#95,290
of 26,238,951 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#171
of 13,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#358
of 177,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,238,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.