You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
GFP-Transgenic Animals for In Vivo Imaging: Rats, Rabbits, and Pigs
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 12 |
Book title |
In Vivo Cellular Imaging Using Fluorescent Proteins
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-61779-797-2_12 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-61779-796-5, 978-1-61779-797-2
|
Authors |
Takashi Murakami, Eiji Kobayashi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 22% |
Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 28% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 17% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
Materials Science | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2021.
All research outputs
#20,480,611
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,975
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,684
of 245,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#427
of 477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.