↓ Skip to main content

Polypropylene and polypropylene/polyglecaprone (Ultrapro(r)) meshes in the repair of incisional hernia in rats

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Polypropylene and polypropylene/polyglecaprone (Ultrapro(r)) meshes in the repair of incisional hernia in rats
Published in
Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, June 2015
DOI 10.1590/s0102-865020150060000001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edivaldo Massazo Utiyama, Maria Beatriz Sartor de Faria Rosa, Marina de Paula Andres, Jocielle Santos de Miranda, Sérgio Henrique Bastos Damous, Cláudio Augusto Vianna Birolini, Luciana Lamarão Damous, Edna Frasson de Souza Montero

Abstract

To compare the inflammatory response of three different meshes on abdominal hernia repair in an experimental model of incisional hernia. Median fascial incision and skin synthesis was performed on 30 Wistar rats. After 21 days, abdominal hernia developed was corrected as follows: 1) No mesh; 2) Polypropylene mesh; and, 3) Ultrapro(r) mesh. After 21 days, the mesh and surrounding tissue were submitted to macroscopic (presence of adhesions, mesh retraction), microscopic analysis to identify and quantify the inflammatory and fibrotic response using a score based on a predefined scale of 0-3 degrees, evaluating infiltration of macrophages, giant cells, neutrophils and lymphocytes. No significant difference was seen among groups in adherences, fibrosis, giant cells, macrophages, neutrophils or lymphocytes (p>0.05). Mesh shrinkage was observed in all groups, but also no difference was observed between polypropylene and Ultrapro mesh (7.0±9.9 vs. 7.4±10.1, respectively, p=0.967). Post-operatory complications included fistula, abscess, dehiscence, serohematic collection and reherniation, but with no difference among groups (p=0.363). There is no difference between polypropylene (high-density) and Ultrapro(r) (low-density) meshes at 21 days after surgery in extraperitoneal use in rats, comparing inflammatory response, mesh shortening, adhesions or complications.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 14 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 31%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 8%
Chemistry 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 14 54%