↓ Skip to main content

Acceptance patterns and decision-making for human papillomavirus vaccination among parents in Vietnam: an in-depth qualitative study post-vaccination

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acceptance patterns and decision-making for human papillomavirus vaccination among parents in Vietnam: an in-depth qualitative study post-vaccination
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-629
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane K Cover, Nguyen Quy Nghi, D Scott LaMontagne, Dang Thi Thanh Huyen, Nguyen Tran Hien, Le Thi Nga

Abstract

The GAVI Alliance's decision in late 2011 to invite developing countries to apply for funding for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine introduction underscores the importance of understanding levels of HPV vaccine acceptance in developing country settings. In this paper, we present findings from qualitative research on parents' rationales for vaccinating or not vaccinating their daughters (vaccine acceptance) and their decision-making process in the context of an HPV vaccination demonstration project in Vietnam (2008-2009).

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 121 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 35 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Psychology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 41 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,113,920
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,745
of 18,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,404
of 187,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#115
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.