↓ Skip to main content

Chemoinformatics and Computational Chemical Biology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Chemoinformatics and Computational Chemical Biology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Some Trends in Chem(o)informatics
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Molecular Similarity Measures
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 The Ups and Downs of Structure-Activity Landscapes
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Computational Analysis of Activity and Selectivity Cliffs
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Chemoinformatics and Computational Chemical Biology
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Predicting the Performance of Fingerprint Similarity Searching
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Bayesian methods in virtual screening and chemical biology.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Chemoinformatics and Computational Chemical Biology
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Fragment Descriptors in Structure–Property Modeling and Virtual Screening
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 The Scaffold Tree: An Efficient Navigation in the Scaffold Universe
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Pharmacophore-Based Virtual Screening
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 De novo drug design.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Classification of Chemical Reactions and Chemoinformatic Processing of Enzymatic Transformations
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Informatics Approach to the Rational Design of siRNA Libraries
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Beyond Rhodopsin: G Protein-Coupled Receptor Structure and Modeling Incorporating the β2-adrenergic and Adenosine A 2A Crystal Structures
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Methods for Combinatorial and Parallel Library Design
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 The Interweaving of Cheminformatics and HTS
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Computational Systems Chemical Biology
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Ligand-Based Approaches to In Silico Pharmacology
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Molecular Test Systems for Computational Selectivity Studies and Systematic Analysis of Compound Selectivity Profiles
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Application of Support Vector Machine-Based Ranking Strategies to Search for Target-Selective Compounds
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 What Do We Know?: Simple Statistical Techniques that Help
Attention for Chapter 3: The Ups and Downs of Structure-Activity Landscapes
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Ups and Downs of Structure-Activity Landscapes
Chapter number 3
Book title
Chemoinformatics and Computational Chemical Biology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/978-1-60761-839-3_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-60761-838-6, 978-1-60761-839-3
Authors

Rajarshi Guha, Guha, Rajarshi

Abstract

In this chapter we discuss the landscape view of structure-activity relationships (SARs). The motivation for such a view is that SARs come in a variety of forms, such as those where small changes in structure lead to small changes in activity or where small structural lead to significant changes in activity (also termed activity cliffs). Thus, an SAR dataset is viewed as a landscape comprised of smooth plains, rolling hills, and jagged gorges. We review the history of this view and early quantitative approaches that attempted to encode the landscape. We then discuss some recent developments that directly characterize structure-activity landscapes, in one case with the goal of highlighting activity cliffs while the other allows one to resolve different types of SAR that may be present in a dataset. We highlight some applications of these approaches, such as predictive model development and SAR elucidation, to SAR datasets obtained from the literature. Finally, we conclude with a summary of the landscape approach and why it provides an intuitive and rigorous alternative to standard views of structure-activity data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 5%
Australia 1 5%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 41%
Other 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Computer Science 2 9%
Chemistry 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2013.
All research outputs
#14,136,253
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,141
of 13,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,152
of 124,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.