You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Chemoinformatics and Computational Chemical Biology
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 8 |
| Book title |
Chemoinformatics and Computational Chemical Biology
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-60761-839-3_8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-60761-838-6, 978-1-60761-839-3
|
| Authors |
Birchall K, Gillet VJ, Birchall, Kristian, Gillet, Valerie J., Kristian Birchall, Valerie J. Gillet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 33% |
| Researcher | 6 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 21% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2018.
All research outputs
#19,017,658
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#8,198
of 13,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,908
of 95,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,423 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.