↓ Skip to main content

In Silico Methods for Predicting Drug Toxicity

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'In Silico Methods for Predicting Drug Toxicity'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 QSAR Methods.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 In Silico 3D Modeling of Binding Activities.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Modeling Pharmacokinetics.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Modeling ADMET.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 In Silico Prediction of Chemically Induced Mutagenicity: How to Use QSAR Models and Interpret Their Results.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 In Silico Methods for Carcinogenicity Assessment.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 VirtualToxLab: Exploring the Toxic Potential of Rejuvenating Substances Found in Traditional Medicines.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 In Silico Model for Developmental Toxicity: How to Use QSAR Models and Interpret Their Results.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 In Silico Models for Repeated-Dose Toxicity (RDT): Prediction of the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) and Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level (LOAEL) for Drugs.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 In Silico Models for Acute Systemic Toxicity.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 In Silico Models for Hepatotoxicity.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 In Silico Models for Ecotoxicity of Pharmaceuticals.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Use of Read-Across Tools.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Adverse Outcome Pathways as Tools to Assess Drug-Induced Toxicity.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 A Systems Biology Approach for Identifying Hepatotoxicant Groups Based on Similarity in Mechanisms of Action and Chemical Structure.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 In Silico Study of In Vitro GPCR Assays by QSAR Modeling.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Taking Advantage of Databases.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 QSAR Models at the US FDA/NCTR.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 A Round Trip from Medicinal Chemistry to Predictive Toxicology.
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 The Use of In Silico Models Within a Large Pharmaceutical Company.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 The Consultancy Activity on In Silico Models for Genotoxic Prediction of Pharmaceutical Impurities.
Attention for Chapter 1: QSAR Methods.
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
QSAR Methods.
Chapter number 1
Book title
In Silico Methods for Predicting Drug Toxicity
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3609-0_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3607-6, 978-1-4939-3609-0
Authors

Giuseppina Gini

Editors

Emilio Benfenati

Abstract

In this chapter, we introduce the basis of computational chemistry and discuss how computational methods have been extended to some biological properties and toxicology, in particular. Since about 20 years, chemical experimentation is more and more replaced by modeling and virtual experimentation, using a large core of mathematics, chemistry, physics, and algorithms. Then we see how animal experiments, aimed at providing a standardized result about a biological property, can be mimicked by new in silico methods. Our emphasis here is on toxicology and on predicting properties through chemical structures. Two main streams of such models are available: models that consider the whole molecular structure to predict a value, namely QSAR (Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships), and models that find relevant substructures to predict a class, namely SAR. The term in silico discovery is applied to chemical design, to computational toxicology, and to drug discovery. We discuss how the experimental practice in biological science is moving more and more toward modeling and simulation. Such virtual experiments confirm hypotheses, provide data for regulation, and help in designing new chemicals.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Other 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 15%
Chemistry 3 11%
Computer Science 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 37%