↓ Skip to main content

In Silico Methods for Predicting Drug Toxicity

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'In Silico Methods for Predicting Drug Toxicity'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 QSAR Methods.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 In Silico 3D Modeling of Binding Activities.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Modeling Pharmacokinetics.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Modeling ADMET.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 In Silico Prediction of Chemically Induced Mutagenicity: How to Use QSAR Models and Interpret Their Results.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 In Silico Methods for Carcinogenicity Assessment.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 VirtualToxLab: Exploring the Toxic Potential of Rejuvenating Substances Found in Traditional Medicines.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 In Silico Model for Developmental Toxicity: How to Use QSAR Models and Interpret Their Results.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 In Silico Models for Repeated-Dose Toxicity (RDT): Prediction of the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) and Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level (LOAEL) for Drugs.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 In Silico Models for Acute Systemic Toxicity.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 In Silico Models for Hepatotoxicity.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 In Silico Models for Ecotoxicity of Pharmaceuticals.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Use of Read-Across Tools.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Adverse Outcome Pathways as Tools to Assess Drug-Induced Toxicity.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 A Systems Biology Approach for Identifying Hepatotoxicant Groups Based on Similarity in Mechanisms of Action and Chemical Structure.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 In Silico Study of In Vitro GPCR Assays by QSAR Modeling.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Taking Advantage of Databases.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 QSAR Models at the US FDA/NCTR.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 A Round Trip from Medicinal Chemistry to Predictive Toxicology.
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 The Use of In Silico Models Within a Large Pharmaceutical Company.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 The Consultancy Activity on In Silico Models for Genotoxic Prediction of Pharmaceutical Impurities.
Attention for Chapter 16: In Silico Study of In Vitro GPCR Assays by QSAR Modeling.
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
In Silico Study of In Vitro GPCR Assays by QSAR Modeling.
Chapter number 16
Book title
In Silico Methods for Predicting Drug Toxicity
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3609-0_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3607-6, 978-1-4939-3609-0
Authors

Kamel Mansouri, Richard S. Judson

Editors

Emilio Benfenati

Abstract

The US EPA's ToxCast program is screening thousands of chemicals of environmental interest in hundreds of in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays. One goal is to prioritize chemicals for more detailed analyses based on activity in assays that target molecular initiating events (MIEs) of adverse outcome pathways (AOPs). However, the chemical space of interest for environmental exposure is much wider than ToxCast's chemical library. In silico methods such as quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) are proven and cost-effective approaches to predict biological activity for untested chemicals. However, empirical data is needed to build and validate QSARs. ToxCast has developed datasets for about 2000 chemicals ideal for training and testing QSAR models. The overall goal of the present work was to develop QSAR models to fill the data gaps in larger environmental chemical lists. The specific aim of the current work was to build QSAR models for 18 G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) assays, part of the aminergic family. Two QSAR modeling strategies were adopted: classification models were developed to separate chemicals into active/non-active classes, and then regression models were built to predict the potency values of the bioassays for the active chemicals. Multiple software programs were used to calculate constitutional, topological, and substructural molecular descriptors from two-dimensional (2D) chemical structures. Model-fitting methods included PLSDA (partial least square discriminant analysis), SVMs (support vector machines), kNNs (k-nearest neighbors), and PLSs (partial least squares). Genetic algorithms (GAs) were applied as a variable selection technique to select the most predictive molecular descriptors for each assay. N-fold cross-validation (CV) coupled with multi-criteria decision-making fitting criteria was used to evaluate the models. Finally, the models were applied to make predictions within the established chemical space limits. The most accurate model was for the bovine nonselective dopamine receptor (bDR_NS) GPCR assay, for which the classification balanced accuracy reached 0.96 in fitting and 0.95 in fivefold CV, with only two latent variables. These results demonstrate the accuracy of QSAR models to predict the biological activity of chemicals specifically for each one of the studied assays.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 9%
Chemistry 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 5 23%