@klimaatTv @RalfBodelier @DeGroene Uuuuhm beste @DeGroene kennen jullie het werk van @JKSteinberger al? https://t.co/a0hgHymmgo En van @ron_rovers over grondstoffencrisis? En de discourses of climate delay https://t.co/gDiuzB825v En @LakaNieuws en @PPchef
@DannydeVreede Moet je niet doen. Oplossingen zijn er gewoon. Alleen het exorbitante energiegebruik van nu kan echt niet meer. Gaat ten koste van anderen buiten het westen, ook qua grondstoffen. 17 dagen dunkelflaute. That's all. Oplossingen genoeg. Check
RT @JKSteinberger: 5⃣ Rao & Baer 2012 https://t.co/a0o6qAF9gQ 5⃣ Rao & Min 2018 https://t.co/fjVomWBZoW 6⃣ Rao, Min & Mastrucci 2019 https:…
@Marien_Boonman @hotzehofstra @SilvioErkens @fossiltreaty @urgenda @Proseu_Project @SONNET_energy @CANinterreg @AnneMSchwencke In Glasgow waren meer lobbyisten van de fossiele industrie dan afgevaardigden van onze geïnformeerde democratie, liet Guardian zi
@man_named_bob @SteB777 @EliotJacobson @fossiltreaty there's a lot of people tackling it if we could just empower them :( https://t.co/qr8jztJJBs https://t.co/qXwRtfQrhC https://t.co/SneWnCSv2w https://t.co/0nJ4ZqWpZm https://t.co/eJClcy3315
@JacquelynGill @kristinapistone @ClimateHuman @hausfath @dougmcneall Here's some actual relevant science & reading from people who understand our predicament - this is what Peter is talking about and projecting lack of empathy for humanity on Peter is
@richardodurrant I need to correct this Millward-Hopkins, Steinberger, Rao and Oswald, apologies https://t.co/IfF7PIgh3B
@ThierryAaron @JacquelynGill @ClimateKev @RARohde The rebuttal based off anti-malthusian sentiment and describing how scientists "don't know how to fix these problems" clearly shows you missed the point. Both are addressed in the article itself. The topic
@JeremieVaneeckh @ThomasRotthier Dat is exact wat de degrowth-beweging inhoudt: voor anderen bepalen wat ze nodig hebben, en aan 90% van bevolking zeggen dat ze moeten inbinden. Zie ook deze denkoefening, die het tracht concreet te maken: elkeen "genoeg" v
@arnouxus @TKIUrbanEnergy @MinisterieEZK @D66 @VVD Aan roeptoeteren heeft niemand wat. We zitten nu al op de helft van wat nodig is als we dit scenario volgen: https://t.co/ltReKrOG5b
@marissa69904566 @Olivier_Anker Het is ook waanzin te denken dat wij hier in het westen door kunnen gaan op de huidige voet. Er is maar 1 oplossing en dat is #degrowth. Leestip dit draadje: https://t.co/ltReKrOG5b We zitten nu al op de helft van de benodig
@chrstopher_c @remcodb @ClimateOutreach @klimaatmars @NLRebellion Maar ik moet vandaag een plan afschrijven voor een nieuwe campagne dus die zet ik op mijn to do lijst. We moeten onze samenlevingen binnen de grenzen van de planeet loodsen en als je dat wil
RT @JKSteinberger: 5⃣ Rao & Baer 2012 https://t.co/a0o6qAF9gQ 5⃣ Rao & Min 2018 https://t.co/fjVomWBZoW 6⃣ Rao, Min & Mastrucci 2019 https:…
@Nuclearjunkie @dorfman_p All minerals are technically/economically 'finite'; your use of the term 'plentiful' shows your bias here. E.g., as long ago as 1999, OECD said nuclear cannot solve climate problem because it's a finite resource. We can put figu
RT @rethinkecon: Paper #1: Socio-economic conditions for satisfying human needs at low energy use: An international analysis of social prov…
Paper #1: Socio-economic conditions for satisfying human needs at low energy use: An international analysis of social provisioning https://t.co/EkMnXc4UaX Paper #2: Providing decent living with minimum energy: A global scenario https://t.co/En7IO5EugJ
@NeilSalter4 @patrick_s_smart @endhunting @BellaMyBeauty @MichaelEMann @InquisitiveUrsa @SteB777 @OnionPirate @DoctorVive @circulareconomy I like, for instance, this analysis by 'degrowthers' https://t.co/7ACzNZ96SA Extract: https://t.co/Ckhuo5wZzj
@JoaoPedras6 that must because you're ignorant of what the science has to say https://t.co/VPtD6e1c5c
@DejectedEarth Sure thing hon. This and plant-based diets does it. https://t.co/zzJBdg6tW1
@gwynne_steve @GeorgeMonbiot @DrEmilyGrossman @ThierryAaron Resource use globally is too high, regardless of distribution, but that doesn't mean it corresponds to the resource use necessary for a decent life for all. See for example: https://t.co/zzJBdg6tW
@CEJJacobs @AukeHoekstra @martiendas @ClimateHuman And look at the root of this problem. We need to build fair societies within the planetairy boundaries https://t.co/a0hgHymmgo
RT @JKSteinberger: 5⃣ Rao & Baer 2012 https://t.co/a0o6qAF9gQ 5⃣ Rao & Min 2018 https://t.co/fjVomWBZoW 6⃣ Rao, Min & Mastrucci 2019 https:…
RT @JKSteinberger: 5⃣ Rao & Baer 2012 https://t.co/a0o6qAF9gQ 5⃣ Rao & Min 2018 https://t.co/fjVomWBZoW 6⃣ Rao, Min & Mastrucci 2019 https:…
RT @JKSteinberger: 5⃣ Rao & Baer 2012 https://t.co/a0o6qAF9gQ 5⃣ Rao & Min 2018 https://t.co/fjVomWBZoW 6⃣ Rao, Min & Mastrucci 2019 https:…
RT @JKSteinberger: 5⃣ Rao & Baer 2012 https://t.co/a0o6qAF9gQ 5⃣ Rao & Min 2018 https://t.co/fjVomWBZoW 6⃣ Rao, Min & Mastrucci 2019 https:…
RT @JKSteinberger: 5⃣ Rao & Baer 2012 https://t.co/a0o6qAF9gQ 5⃣ Rao & Min 2018 https://t.co/fjVomWBZoW 6⃣ Rao, Min & Mastrucci 2019 https:…
RT @ExtinctionR_SV: @reallyraviverma @PalmOilDetect @RSPOtweets The problem is the extractive, colonial captialist system of rich countires…
@reallyraviverma @PalmOilDetect @RSPOtweets The problem is the extractive, colonial captialist system of rich countires which is depleting poor nations. It would be possible to provide livliehood for a very large population under a different system https:/
@Introversum1 @ivereadabook @roosvonk Ik ben meer voor iedereen een onesie en dat iedereen deze paper van prof. Julia Steinberger even leest hoe we met 10 miljard mensen binnen de grenzen van de planeet kunnen leven: #climatejustice #COP26 https://t.co/lt
@remcodb Heel goed @klimaatmars. Kernenergie is geen oplossing zolang je gevaarlijk kernafvalprobleem creëert. Energiebesparing is de grote olifant in de kamer. Oplossingen staan voor onze neus https://t.co/6S40I7CMbm maar energievraag écht verminderen i
@JoeriRogelj @KevinClimate These may be shared already but: https://t.co/CsBjpuUP1E https://t.co/z5JDvG9oEu
@ShazzerMac3 @CarolineLucas @skeapspeaks This kind of things? https://t.co/7ACzNZ96SA https://t.co/yj4dBmzZEn
@Peter46608736 @RensvanTilburg Zie studies die dit doorrekenen. Volgtip @urgenda visie 2030 en @Use_Less_Group @UKFIRES https://t.co/JHPPPemsV1 En: https://t.co/NJiOD1fFdW
@jodistanbul @bethsawin we can provide quite a decent living for everyone within planetary boundaries. read this, its a good paper. https://t.co/mPz5DR2qvc
@BakaKarasu @AdamRMG @Unpop_Science @matthewhayek this is a fascist argument used to justify purges and genocide, and is completely pseudo-scientific. we can provide 10 billion people with a decent living, no problem. https://t.co/mPz5DR2qvc
RT @kihelpata: @LiberationPill @starmanjason i keep posting this paper but it keeps being important to post this paper https://t.co/sdbjQlQ…
@LiberationPill @starmanjason i keep posting this paper but it keeps being important to post this paper https://t.co/sdbjQlQxiT
@miasvedang Hej. Hittade efter lite letande detta igen. Handlar om precis det du nämnde i din tveet. https://t.co/9mCco6LzFZ
@trans_zero and this is fully supported by research https://t.co/JO5SEZCx7L
RT @IsabelleLetell1: @KatarinaJohans8 "Energibehovet" "kommer att" Som om det finns inget alternativ även om vi vet att det finns. https://…
@KatarinaJohans8 "Energibehovet" "kommer att" Som om det finns inget alternativ även om vi vet att det finns. https://t.co/apV7YGTyv0
@Que_Lenergie @GoldbergNic @timparrique @AuroreLalucq @colombus Un début de réponse ici : https://t.co/DSH5PWal3K J'ai lu l'intro «à la va vite» je crois comprendre que c'est 60% de moins en valeur moyenne et 95% (!?!?) de réduction pour un occidental moye
@ReintJanRenes @D66 Ik zou nog meer genieten als ik weet dat we binnen de planetaire grenzen blijven 💚 https://t.co/a0hgHymmgo
RT @JKSteinberger: 5⃣ Rao & Baer 2012 https://t.co/a0o6qAF9gQ 5⃣ Rao & Min 2018 https://t.co/fjVomWBZoW 6⃣ Rao, Min & Mastrucci 2019 https:…
@Phattmoster @Kevin_Matthews_ @GeorgeMonbiot In fact this study (https://t.co/8oBXBBcK9Z) calculates that with today’s technology everyone on Earth could have a standard of living equivalent to 1960s Switzerland without breaking planetary boundaries.
@trans_zero i think "middle class lifestyle" is too vague. this paper shows that we can all be well fed, own a smartphone, and live in comfy, temp. controlled houses, using much less energy than we do today. (the DLE arrow below) the whole paper is worth
RT @JKSteinberger: And of course Joel Millward-Hopkins, who may or may not be on twitter, developed a global scenario of decent living ener…
RT @gacqyy: Providing decent living with minimum energy: A global scenario https://t.co/6PkUO7rkYJ
RT @JKSteinberger: And of course Joel Millward-Hopkins, who may or may not be on twitter, developed a global scenario of decent living ener…
And of course Joel Millward-Hopkins, who may or may not be on twitter, developed a global scenario of decent living energy, published almost exactly a year ago. 7/ https://t.co/ZI1kpWh8Fq https://t.co/zzJBdg6tW1
@nephologue Work by @JKSteinberger and others clearly show that we could meet human needs at much lower enegry demands, why not focus as she does on researching how we can choose to transition from our growth based system? https://t.co/Cd7AhWocXm
@IPCC does not develop its own scenarios. It assesses existing scenarios submitted to @IIASAVienna scenarios database. The last link is so far the only scenario submitted @StuartBCapstick
See links below to the only 3 global scenarios with sufficiency and North/South decent living standard convergence https://t.co/uA0aLcvseL https://t.co/l78duQZpvD https://t.co/FgXa6YujLz
@KleurigD @larsroobol @rbrnd @thijsdelacourt @FlorijnDeGraaf @BDERProject @_Resourcefully @Ecovat1 @Ecodorp 7 miljard mensen die gaan consumeren zoals de rijkste 10% nu, dat is collectieve zelfmoord: https://t.co/DCsCNLmZtR Manoeuvreer onze samenleving bin
@CodyflyerNl @larsroobol @rbrnd @wvcaspel @RikHJHarmsen @ZijlstraRs De nuance zien is het gevaar van kernenergie onderkennen, helemaal tijdens een klimaatcrisis. En is de oplossingen @TKIUrbanEnergy, van Absolute Zero @Use_Less_Group @UKFIRES, de scenario'
Providing decent living with minimum energy: A global scenario https://t.co/pKBvfKvFhq
@sixtocristiani ah yo estaba flashenado vos querés datos en serio jajaj. Energía le tenés que pedir a Edenor y Edesur datos de consumo, y algo de combustibles. Después ni idea, da para pensar. Quizá este paper tiene algo que ver con eso https://t.co/4ebOQi
L'étude en question: "Providing decent living with minimum energy: A global scenario" https://t.co/qCRpZlas4Z
@eelte747 @pbeyssac @vkaltenbronn @francescuG vous vivez sans smartphone si vous le cassez. Et encore ça repose sur des hypothèses farfelues. (7/n) https://t.co/lZn5YSUagd
@rodrigospesia Your words, not mine. Under a different model of energy, material and wealth distribution, we could dramatically reduce our footprint compared to current levels. See for instance this paper by @JKSteinberger et al: https://t.co/TzkyUcjaVp
@zmooc @FritsLevie @PKuipersMunneke Het grootste taboe: ontgroeien. Het is tijd voor een trias energetica 2.0: wat wekken we duurzaam op en hoe gaan we dat gebruiken. Nederland kan prima meedoen https://t.co/a0hgHymmgo https://t.co/z24cGPhNaa
@504_dr I would argue the planet can comfortably support 10 billion & that a more equal allocation of resources would stabilize world population as a side-effect of higher standard of living for women in the Global South. See this study by @JKSteinber
@Vic_Gill @RHarrabin Very good. Last year, a peer-reviewed paper stated "We thus assume the global housing stock is fully replaced via a worldwide deployment of advanced new buildings" Can you imagine the ecocide from raw material extraction and doubling t
"To avoid catastrophic ecological collapse, it is clear that drastic & challenging societal transformations must occur at all levels, gm the individual to institutional, & from supply through to demand...
@marialavis @KenCaldeira @claydumas @ezraklein @EricHolthaus Nope, this is just plain false, because energy services =/= energy use. See new Low Energy Demand & Decent Living Energy scenarios by Arnulf Grubler, Narasimha Rao and friends (including me).
@JerusalemDemsas And doing research on how to provide equitably for all, see this https://t.co/GTzKbcJTBG and this https://t.co/Mb76nvcuuf and this https://t.co/zzJBdfOSxr
@ProfEnergyHuber @Luisamneubauer Womit wir bei der interessanten Frage sind, was ein gutes Leben ausmacht. https://t.co/PfpO9Sk1Sl
RT @jasonhickel: This is exciting. New research by @JKSteinberger's team, hot off the press, finds that we could scale down global energy…
Nog meer goed nws om vdaag te verspreiden. Lekker!
RT @jasonhickel: This is exciting. New research by @JKSteinberger's team, hot off the press, finds that we could scale down global energy…
@hykka @LasseClimate @dwallacewells @hausfath @KetanJ0 @DrSimEvans @ExtinctionR @Fridays4future @FridayForFuture @KevinClimate This is extremely dumb, and we wrote a whole paper showing that. We even included this paragraph, specially for Juhani here. http
@mark_lynas @MrFlibbleRules The resources do not exist to create that future -- full stop. You do not understand the nature of complexity versus entropy in your affluent ideology. Other views are available, but they don't apply precondition of affluence f
@Gregdt1 It is low indeed, this is covering the absolute necessary to meet basic needs and live happily. From another paper, here a comparison of current energy use across all countries (1) an example of low-demand scenario (2), and a scenario comparison
RT @JKikstra: There’s more. Globally, even with limited technological progress, minimum needs are much lower than total energy needs even…
@rezendi @jasonhickel @leashless Maybe. The politics are hard but evidence suggests we can use less energy/materials while providing for a growing population (degrowth). We're also making wild assumptions about unproven, ineffective CCS to stay below 1.5/2
RT @JKSteinberger: @_HannahRitchie @MaxCRoser Sort of tired of OWID ignoring our research that shows that (1) energy use and living well a…
@Markus_Soeder @JKSteinberger den hier schon gesehen? Da fällt mir euer grandioser Höhlen-Absatz ein aus diesem Artikel: https://t.co/2FN9r8msiU
@ZKalamov @DrKevGuitar @Noahpinion I think we're talking about a much larger, general ECO crisis of climate, biodiversity, resouce use, etc. Not one specific compound from one specific sector of industry. They're not even comparable. Also, who is saying
RT @jasonhickel: This is exciting. New research by @JKSteinberger's team, hot off the press, finds that we could scale down global energy…
RT @JKSteinberger: @_HannahRitchie @MaxCRoser Sort of tired of OWID ignoring our research that shows that (1) energy use and living well a…
@joanvilallanars @jm_mallarach No se trata de opiniones y juicios de valor. Los 15 GJ fueron obtenidos por Joel Millward-Hopkins, Julia K. Steinbergera, Narasimha D.Raoc y Yannick Oswald. El máximo compatible con los escenarios realistas de 1.5°C se en
There’s more. Globally, even with limited technological progress, minimum needs are much lower than total energy needs even under very ambitious climate mitigation scenarios. @narasimhadrao, @JKSteinberger and colleagues found similar results (https://t.
@drvolts Hey Dave, this kind of sounds like a degrowth scenario, no? https://t.co/yGAkgVKrRG
@juliancubero @Peters_Glen @BrankoMilan It is well known that GDPpp beyond 5-10kUSD does little to improve well-being. The concept of 'sufficiency' (decent living with minimum energy), will likely get more attention in time to come. And who says economic
RT @JKSteinberger: @MaxCRoser @musta_joutsen @_HannahRitchie In terms of specific levels of need satisfaction we consider to be sufficient,…
RT @JKSteinberger: @_HannahRitchie @MaxCRoser Sort of tired of OWID ignoring our research that shows that (1) energy use and living well a…
@MacroEdge1 @BillGates And then of course everything degrowth and sufficiency related. For example this paper: "Providing decent living with minimum energy: A global scenario" by @JKSteinberger https://t.co/iyNyFo4UbP
RT @JKSteinberger: @MaxCRoser @musta_joutsen @_HannahRitchie In terms of specific levels of need satisfaction we consider to be sufficient,…