↓ Skip to main content

Electronic Health Records: Privacy, Confidentiality, and Security

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
32 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electronic Health Records: Privacy, Confidentiality, and Security
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, September 2012
DOI 10.1001/virtualmentor.2012.14.9.stas1-1209
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurinda B Harman, Cathy A Flite, Kesa Bond

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 189 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 19%
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 58 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 31 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 13%
Engineering 9 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 4%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 62 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,177,809
of 26,186,522 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#336
of 2,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,534
of 189,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,186,522 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.