The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A survey of visually induced symptoms and associated factors in spectators of three dimensional stereoscopic movies
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-779 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Angelo G Solimini, Alice Mannocci, Domitilla Di Thiene, Giuseppe La Torre |
Abstract |
The increasing popularity of commercial movies showing three dimensional (3D) computer generated images has raised concern about image safety and possible side effects on population health.This study aims to (1) quantify the occurrence of visually induced symptoms suffered by the spectators during and after viewing a commercial 3D movie and (2) to assess individual and environmental factors associated to those symptoms. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Brazil | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 2% |
New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 56 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 19% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
Researcher | 6 | 10% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Other | 12 | 20% |
Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 8 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 14% |
Psychology | 6 | 10% |
Computer Science | 4 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 19% |
Unknown | 18 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2013.
All research outputs
#14,151,132
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,261
of 14,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,391
of 168,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#203
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.