RT @Nachtzuster2: 6/12/21 - Virale culturen voor COVID19 review. Conclusies: Voor de overdracht zijn VOLLEDIGE levende virussen nodig, NIET…
RT @Nachtzuster2: 6/12/21 - Virale culturen voor COVID19 review. Conclusies: Voor de overdracht zijn VOLLEDIGE levende virussen nodig, NIET…
RT @Nachtzuster2: 6/12/21 - Virale culturen voor COVID19 review. Conclusies: Voor de overdracht zijn VOLLEDIGE levende virussen nodig, NIET…
RT @Nachtzuster2: 6/12/21 - Virale culturen voor COVID19 review. Conclusies: Voor de overdracht zijn VOLLEDIGE levende virussen nodig, NIET…
RT @Nachtzuster2: 6/12/21 - Virale culturen voor COVID19 review. Conclusies: Voor de overdracht zijn VOLLEDIGE levende virussen nodig, NIET…
RT @Nachtzuster2: 6/12/21 - Virale culturen voor COVID19 review. Conclusies: Voor de overdracht zijn VOLLEDIGE levende virussen nodig, NIET…
RT @Nachtzuster2: 6/12/21 - Virale culturen voor COVID19 review. Conclusies: Voor de overdracht zijn VOLLEDIGE levende virussen nodig, NIET…
RT @Nachtzuster2: 6/12/21 - Virale culturen voor COVID19 review. Conclusies: Voor de overdracht zijn VOLLEDIGE levende virussen nodig, NIET…
RT @Nachtzuster2: 6/12/21 - Virale culturen voor COVID19 review. Conclusies: Voor de overdracht zijn VOLLEDIGE levende virussen nodig, NIET…
RT @Nachtzuster2: 6/12/21 - Virale culturen voor COVID19 review. Conclusies: Voor de overdracht zijn VOLLEDIGE levende virussen nodig, NIET…
@stoertebekr @luebberding > Untauglichkeit PCR Tests https://t.co/HsnKgKLQrz oder hier, hat @c_drosten sogar dran mitgearbeitet https://t.co/Ie9g9oqZOW > Und für die Abwesenheit von Evidenz bez. Luftfilter kann ich ihnen natürlich keine Quelle nennen
RT @TomEvan81013762: @authordrummer And this....ALL tests have been run between 35-40cts per the WHO. Even Fauci said over 35 cts=DEAD nucl…
RT @TomEvan81013762: @authordrummer And this....ALL tests have been run between 35-40cts per the WHO. Even Fauci said over 35 cts=DEAD nucl…
RT @TomEvan81013762: @authordrummer And this....ALL tests have been run between 35-40cts per the WHO. Even Fauci said over 35 cts=DEAD nucl…
RT @TomEvan81013762: @authordrummer And this....ALL tests have been run between 35-40cts per the WHO. Even Fauci said over 35 cts=DEAD nucl…
RT @TomEvan81013762: @authordrummer And this....ALL tests have been run between 35-40cts per the WHO. Even Fauci said over 35 cts=DEAD nucl…
All tests are in error.
@Jakob3390 @74christianrl @obstructionist @HolmgaardB Det gør jo ikke just sagen bedre, at man har overfortolket nogle intetsigende testsvar og givet folk utroværdige diagnoser i årevis, vel? Hvis din læge er kritisk indstillet, vil han være enig med mig
@74christianrl @Jakob3390 @obstructionist @HolmgaardB Det er kendt i den videnskabelige litteratur, at PCR metoden ikke kan afsløre sygdom, smitte eller hele viruser. Kun fragmenter: 'Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments
@KulmwGetmw48 あなたの大好き査読済み論文です😊 何と書いてますか?😊 https://t.co/yFxaaUiuCc https://t.co/yrJvEfrQGo
@KulmwGetmw48 さてさてあなたの大好き査読済み論文です😊 https://t.co/yFxaaUiuCc あなたがだしたのはプレプリントですよね?😊 https://t.co/GWyplbsbHp
@KulmwGetmw48 さてさてこちらはあなたの大好き査読済み論文です😊 何と書いてますか😊 https://t.co/yFxaaUiuCc https://t.co/qtio8vnsDR
9 .. pa tudi drugi.. https://t.co/IhJpGykNAZ https://t.co/FZuRnN2jb0
@MrHarryCole @EssexPR "Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR" Testing picks up PART of the virus (dead or live), so are we isolating far too many? [Source: study by @carlheneghan Prof of Evidence-based Me
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
@JonasLKofod @JSurlykke Én ting af gangen, kære uvidende ven: Alle, der beskæftiger sig med tests ved, at PCR giver falske positive svar i månedsvis efter endt infektion. Jeg har allerede dokumenteret det i den anden tråd, du forsøger at plage mig i. He
@JonasLKofod @JSurlykke Du kan vedstå herfra til månen, det ændrer ikke på, at du ikke aner hvad du taler om. Det er dokumenteret overalt, at PCR giver falsk positive svar i månedsvis efter endt infektion. Du gør kun dig selv til grin med din barnlige pås
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
@JonasLKofod @JSurlykke Den pågældende journalistiske genre hedder et debatindlæg. Desværre har Jyllands-Posten ikke medtaget de referencer, der fulgte indlægget, men den pågældende reference er her 👇👇
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
@SHomburg Da hat wohl Fauci die Oxford Metastudie vom 3.12.2020 entdeckt. In der Metastudie wurden 29 Studien analysiert, in denen SARS-CoV-2 zu kultivieren versucht wurde, wenn Proben mit PCR positiv getestet wurden. https://t.co/uepki8RBV3
RT @TheAccountantUK: PCR tests: @carlheneghan (Professor of Evidence-based Medicine @CebmOxford) study concludes "Complete live viruses ar…
PCR tests: @carlheneghan (Professor of Evidence-based Medicine @CebmOxford) study concludes "Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR" https://t.co/CFYrx9Fu70 https://t.co/I4Ou6FNQLi
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
@efunkEM We have old data showing drop in infectivity before the vaccine began after day 8. I haven't seen any studies on omicron yet. https://t.co/sgMalImYQc
Τι συμβαίνει με τα PCR? Τι ανάγκασε τους Tom Jefferson και Carl Heneghan να γράψουν ένα τέτοιο άρθρο? Viral Cultures for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infectivity Assessment: A Systematic Review https://t.co/Ks4pG1St7h
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
@JoseMJG La pcr debería ser una ayuda para q 1 Dr pueda sacar conclusiones con un buen chequeo y si hace falta cn cultivos virales. L prueba en si no debería ser concluyente a parte es muy manipulable con los CT. Pero se han usado como caramelos d aqí la P
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
@enriccanela @MTudela @govern @salutcat @tv3cat Les especificacions de la meva TV indiquen que te 750 nits, fins q fas una medició i veus q son 550. Igualment, que opina d'aquest article: https://t.co/UoAanoLHyv
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
@OhVejtVejt @LiberaMentis80 Postoje radovi koji ukazuju na izolaciju "živog" virusa. Nema ih puno. Jedan od zaključaka ove studije da posle 8 dana od pojave infekcije virus više nije "živ". https://t.co/mJNWbVtAmr
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
@drmaicas @mjimeru @BeatrizTalegon @bar_bero Solo hago q encontrar ejemplos del mal uso de la PCR y sus falsos positivos https://t.co/UoAanoLHyv
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
RT @carlheneghan: here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identificat…
here you go: https://t.co/HLNOW00bOb ‘The live viral culture time window was much shorter than for viral RNA identification’
@Cristina_B @ivan_vitoria @324cat @_AlexArenas Els contagis son PCR+, una proba no apte pel diagnòstic la eina de manipulació més gran de la història amb la que crean onades de contagis de simples refredats inclús de gent sense cap síntoma. Comenceu a pens
RT @IMclure: @DaniNovarama Si quieres ver porq la PCR es una estafa mirate este articulo a parte que es facilmente manipulable, tu hija es…
@Jacobnh_Dk @MaguaSif @KT_Baek @Westegnen Nej, Jacob. PCR kan hverken vise sygdomme eller smitte. Metoden kan kun identificere fragmenter. Enkelt forklaret i konklusionen fra Jefferson et al: 'Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the
@DaniNovarama Si quieres ver porq la PCR es una estafa mirate este articulo a parte que es facilmente manipulable, tu hija es + porq le ha tocado, como tu caso conozco ya decenas, un % en cada clase le toca ser + porq estan presionando para la vac. Infanti
@bar_bero @BeatrizTalegon Estudio de Oxford sobre PCRs Fake también: https://t.co/UoAanoLHyv
RT @KlausKblog: Grunden til, at Facebook ikke kan lide studiet af Jefferson et al er nok, at forfatterne skriver lidt for tydeligt, at PCR…
@MikkelHolmgren Wrong. PCR bruges som bekendt til at finde smitte og viruser - og præcis dette skriver forfatterne, at PCR ikke er i stand til. Fra konklusionen, oversat: 'Komplette (hele) viruser er forudsætningen for smitte, ikke de fragmenter som PCR
Grunden til, at Facebook ikke kan lide studiet af Jefferson et al er nok, at forfatterne skriver lidt for tydeligt, at PCR ikke kan finde viruser og ‘smitte’ - PCR kan kun finde fragmenter. En positiv PCR test betyder med andre ord ingenting. https://t.co
RT @PoehsesReich: @M_Ziesmann @DrEliDavid https://t.co/AwlhdnHAar Und das alles zurückführend auf den Wahnsinn von Drosten.
@PoehsesReich @StimmederVernu9 @hfeldwisch @Tim_Roehn @welt Hier noch einige Ergänzungen zu Ihrer Liste > https://t.co/fyunIeQzAi > https://t.co/Q6Y1p3jDGY > https://t.co/1zG7RpGLNQ
@runjep @7ohn @GobboOtto @Malou43295837 Læs igen. Det er forskerne der ikke stoler på PCR: Man skal se efter patienttegn på infektion for at afgøre om PCR er troværdig. ‘... symptoms, signs & patient co-factors should be used to define the reliability
@RileyCooperLove @AnimeBoy_India @paraga Just a small dose of "disinformation" for ya if you wanna better idea of where the unvaxxed are coming from: https://t.co/YL7NHVbwN5 https://t.co/jI2TVdlX32 https://t.co/pk3yW2QJx0 Tip of the iceberg really, jus
RT @KlausKblog: Den videnskabelige evidens kommer fra Jefferson & Heneghan, Centre of Evidence Based Medicine i England. https://t.co/D5ibm…
@masih_sina Alle smittetal er falske, fordi PCR hverken kan afsløre sygdom, infektion eller hele viruser. PCR kan kun identificere fragmenter, og de er irrelevante i forhold til sygdom & infektion. Man kan altså ikke blive syg af et fragment. https://
@HansBerglund3 Tal for dig selv. Jeg læser alt, hvad jeg kan få fingre i om PCR, og intet af det finder vej til mainstream media. Hvis det var tilfældet, havde medierne forlængst refereret de studier, der har afsløret, at PCR hverken kan finde viruser ell
@elteuavio @LaSelenita @gerardbat Jo em llegeixo estudis confiables per exemple d'oxford: https://t.co/gMczVPg4qM
@AsmundsenMorten https://t.co/MPHJO00KtY (Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR.
@whattheslark @NotDoctrHoliday Which we know but do not uniformly apply especially when using reported infection rates ( identified by PCR) to influence practice and policy https://t.co/F9SflsATke
@HansBerglund3 @Blixt22 @JuulMona @stinuslindgreen @Heunicke @Martin_Geertsen @AlexVanopslagh PCR-testen er langt værre end hvad det studie antyder. PCR kan hverken afsløre sygdom, infektion eller hele viruser - metoden kan kun afsløre fragmenter. PCR er
@Laerkespenner Du kunne lige så godt have skrevet: 'Alle kan stå på hovedet i en natpotte, det er der absolut ingen undskyldninger for.' For PCR-tests kan, ligesom natpotter, hverken afsløre sygdom eller smitte. De kan kun identificere fragmenter uden b
@mariacdscds Ja, jeg ved det simpelthen, ligesom mange andre også ved det. Ingen test kan afsløre en sygdom eller virusinfektion. PCR kan kun identificere fragmenter. https://t.co/I3AbbbI8tg Til din orientering kan raske folk ikke smitte andre. Man ved ik
@ProfPHansen @DOppenheuser @Coefficionado Så længe 'infektioner' defineres som positive PCR-tests, er tallet totalt meningsløst, af den simple grund, at PCR ikke kan afsløre infektioner. https://t.co/I3AbbbqxBI https://t.co/e8V8WZK6jE