RT @andrewbostom: A systematic review published 12/3/20 by the Oxford U Ctr for Evidence-Based Med has confirmed that C19 rtPCR testing pat…
RT @andrewbostom: A systematic review published 12/3/20 by the Oxford U Ctr for Evidence-Based Med has confirmed that C19 rtPCR testing pat…
@PrinzMondkatze @Lillie775 @jens_140081 @bbaw_de @c_drosten @maithi_nk Sollten sie es aus unerfindlichen Gründen nicht wissen aber wissen wollen, fangen Sie hier an - https://t.co/fn6rTamZRK - https://t.co/1qXPaZ92la > Sagen Sie mit bitte GANZ konkret,
@rcsmit @mr_Smith_Econ De Ct-waarde zegt heel veel. Die is namelijk invers logaritmisch proportioneel aan de viral load en dus de besmettingsgraad. https://t.co/2oUIon2gkB
.... from Professors Gupta and Heneghan in September 2020 . Could I please ask if you have any debunk on your sites for the paper below ? https://t.co/ESucY5bnuW
@EWayedd Here you are: https://t.co/I3AbbbqxBI From the conclusion: 'Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR.' Please read the PDF also. https://t.co/TRBtRnE3Va
@ShawnaGofABPoli "Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR." https://t.co/1G8NE6USHw
RT @MostTuitero: @Random_Dragon @MorfoManolo @BiologosV Asintomáticos: https://t.co/ZUVZ4M1Abg Cts PCR https://t.co/WPTm8RJQFs https://t.c…
@abirballan I think PCR should not be used as diagnostic test. However, CDC requires a Ct < 28 for sequencing but there are no requirements to declare a vaccinated person as Covid-19 case. Maybe a better argument against the use of Ct > 28-35 is the
RT @IMclure: @Isabeldiazc92 Cuando descubráis el engaño q es la PCR y como estos arrojan toneladas de falsos positivos dejareis de qerer ha…
RT @IMclure: @Isabeldiazc92 Cuando descubráis el engaño q es la PCR y como estos arrojan toneladas de falsos positivos dejareis de qerer ha…
@Isabeldiazc92 Cuando descubráis el engaño q es la PCR y como estos arrojan toneladas de falsos positivos dejareis de qerer hacer estos test. Aquí un estudio de Oxford: https://t.co/gMczVPg4qM
@lovenursingmery Leer estudos tipo este de Oxford??? Para que??? https://t.co/gMczVPg4qM
@pjvanerp @BorgerPieter @blckbxnews CEBM Oxford studie (C Hanghan), 67% uit klinische samples kan in vitro geen "live virus culture" produceren. Link voor de studie en (mijn) breakdown hierbij van de onderzoeken die gebruikt zijn. 67% false positives.
@andergoikoetxe7 @Javier__CB N tengo gurú, nada + se empezó a hacer PCRs m puse a estudiar el tema, llegué a l conclusión q n és una prueba adecuada, x tanto todas ls cifras dl miedo habría q revisarlas y preguntarnos pq querían amplificar artificialmente
@Yunamond @CharlesAlegret Ni cas a la ciència millor la pseudociència dels medis q ara van de q són la ciència oficial. Y q tot el q posa en dubte aqest nou negoci es negacionisme. https://t.co/gMczVPg4qM
@CharlesAlegret Què n'hem de fer d'aquests negacionistes d'oxford q ens van demostrar q s'està enganyant a la gent? 🤦♂️ https://t.co/gMczVPg4qM
@OrtigiaP @borghi_claudio @matteosalvinimi @maryfagi @fdragoni @LykanLA @AStramezzi @valy_s @Leonard13___ @MercuriRibelle @lucabattanta Premetto che anche io contesto l'utilizzo dei tamponi come metodo diagnostico. Però nel documento si fa riferimento ad u
RT @KlausKblog: Ifølge en systematisk analyse af Jefferson, Heneghan m.fl. varer smitteperioden, når man er syg et sted mellem 4 og 8 dage,…
@6alax1an @FaktaHoldninger @ARZiCSGO_o @HettingClaus @Lundkvist2021 Kun folk, der er syge kan smitte andre. Og kun i den periode, hvor deres infektion kan mærkes. I Sars-Cov-2 drejer det sig om gennemsnitligt 5 dage (højst 8 dage) for dem, der bliver syge
@ahrensborg @ARZiCSGO_o @HettingClaus @Lundkvist2021 Du er et sublimt vrøvlehovede. Intet mindre. Læs litteraturen. https://t.co/D5ibmpQoEu
@ahrensborg @KlausKblog @HettingClaus @Lundkvist2021 Nu er jeg nysgerrig om hvad han har forkert? For hvad jeg har læst, tyder meget på han har ret. "Skal være en aktiv virus, for at smitte" https://t.co/MPHJO00KtY Conclusion is that 95% of testing is bei
@ahrensborg @SaselineS Beklager, men du tager fejl. 'Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR.' Oversat: Der skal komplette, hele virusser til at smitte, ikke de fragmenter, PCR-testen identificerer. http
RT @gutediese: @rosenbusch_ PCR Test nicht. Denn wie wir mittlerweile alle wissen, kann der positive Befund auch nach überstandener Infekti…
@rosenbusch_ PCR Test nicht. Denn wie wir mittlerweile alle wissen, kann der positive Befund auch nach überstandener Infektion erfolgen, wenn kein vermehrungsfähiges Virus mehr vorhanden ist. https://t.co/1qXPaZ92la Über die „nachfolgende“ Vermehrung (welc
@echt_alice @Tim_Roehn über keinen vermehrungsfähigen Virus mehr verfügen. https://t.co/1qXPaZ92la > Warum eigentlich IFR? Die Grippetoten schätzen wir mittels Übersterblichkeit und legt man die gleiche Methode bei SARS-CoV-2 zugrunde, ist das Niveau mi
@EtlirXharra @BackerKoen @BartMesuere @sciensano Las ik in de discussie en conclusie van https://t.co/93u14Mck6q
RT @KlausKblog: @SaselineS Det er vanvid 🤪 Testen kan hverken vise, om man er smitsom eller smittet...! Jefferson & Heneghan, Centre for E…
RT @KlausKblog: @SaselineS Det er vanvid 🤪 Testen kan hverken vise, om man er smitsom eller smittet...! Jefferson & Heneghan, Centre for E…
RT @KlausKblog: @SaselineS Det er vanvid 🤪 Testen kan hverken vise, om man er smitsom eller smittet...! Jefferson & Heneghan, Centre for E…
RT @KlausKblog: @SaselineS Det er vanvid 🤪 Testen kan hverken vise, om man er smitsom eller smittet...! Jefferson & Heneghan, Centre for E…
@SaselineS Det er vanvid 🤪 Testen kan hverken vise, om man er smitsom eller smittet...! Jefferson & Heneghan, Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, peer-reviewed article: 'Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identifi
RT @JavRoJav: Prof. & Director, Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Oxford University: "Complete live viruses are necessary for transmissio…
@tiburonHuertas @EvaValencia_DN @salutcat Os han donat l'eina perfecte per no qüestionar res. A veure si alguna neurona teva enten aquest estudi d'Oxford (cosa q dubto): https://t.co/gMczVPg4qM Hasta luego.
@JaviJmarquez100 @ChakNorris93 @WatchGates @alfwarrior @BlasIgnacio No sé hasta qué punto esa gráfica representa la realidad. Dice que puedes dar positivo en PCR hasta el día 20, pero el Centro de Medicina Basada en Evidencia de la U. de Oxford demostró qu
Viral cultures for COVID-19 infectious potential assessment – a systematic review | Clinical Infectious Diseases | Oxford Academic https://t.co/jXN6QkIXLU
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: https://t.co/Py71kYUKOo #Massentests sind ein wissenschaftlicher Irrweg, ethisch und juristisch verwerflich https://t.…
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: https://t.co/oPKRzOf5KU #Massentests wissenschaftlicher Irrweg, ethisch & juristisch verwerflich https://t.co/p9PwKaRB…
RT @KlausKblog: Ifølge en systematisk analyse af Jefferson, Heneghan m.fl. varer smitteperioden, når man er syg et sted mellem 4 og 8 dage,…
https://t.co/R4zxDRj9OC #Massentests sind ein wissenschaftlicher Irrweg, ethisch und juristisch verwerflich https://t.co/ABh0AyFfFL PCR & .. als untauglich - NIEMANDEN stört's https://t.co/rEXsX6QrtW & https://t.co/YBS92asZee & https://t.co/uh
RT @KlausKblog: Ifølge en systematisk analyse af Jefferson, Heneghan m.fl. varer smitteperioden, når man er syg et sted mellem 4 og 8 dage,…
RT @JavRoJav: Prof. & Director, Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Oxford University: "Complete live viruses are necessary for transmissio…
@jakobsen1337 Det tror jeg faktisk også er sådan, jeg ville gøre - blive hjemme, så længe man er syg. Herregud, symptomerne er overståede på et par dage, og så smitter man ikke længere ... no big deal. 🤗 https://t.co/D5ibmpQoEu
@MarcVegt RNA for longer than 14 days but infectious potential declined after day 8 even among cases with ongoing high viral loads." https://t.co/iBzbEaRDDs 2/2
@MarcVegt Gaan ze het gebruik ervan nu ook stoppen? (Voor anderen, hier is de link: https://t.co/uC9KG3keHF)
@WDRaktuell Befund (RKI > Kat. D1) ist nicht mit einer (neu)Infektion gleichzusetzen. > https://t.co/1qXPaZ92la > https://t.co/fn6rTamZRK 2/2
@AletheiaHappy @rosenbusch_ Das sagt @carlheneghan seit Anfang August 2020 https://t.co/1qXPaZ92la und jeder Laborant (ich war ~10 Jahre als solcher tätig) weiß das; es ist einfach unfassbar, dass bis heute nicht zumindest die testspezifischen cTs berücksi
@fredwalton216 @PersilQ @robinmonotti2 The PCR-method is highly accurate in identifyring viral fragments, yes - but completely unable to show if the swap is infected, as it can't see complete virusses. 'Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission
RT @Bloxywoxy1683: @LaymansScience @AlexBerenson @CDCgov How was it 'misread'? PCR test have been operating above 35CT in many countries…
@CDPHE @TCHDHealth @GovofCO @mnhealth
@MLevitt_NP2013 It's worse. The PCR test in itself cannot identify infectious virus no matter how the cycle threshold is set. 'Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR.' https://t.co/I3AbbbqxBI https://t.c
@LaymansScience @AlexBerenson @CDCgov It's pretty black and white. People have been diagnosed, case numbers recorded as 'positive' - ie a person who is sick with covid, when in fact the PCR test has not been valid as a tool to identify a sick person with
@LaymansScience @AlexBerenson @CDCgov Again you're not making any sense here. 'Laymans Science' - mmm. I'm going to link you again the Oxford Study. https://t.co/VX4NR584Cf
@LaymansScience @AlexBerenson @CDCgov How was it 'misread'? PCR test have been operating above 35CT in many countries to diagnose covid. CDC are now saying that the rules must be different for post vaccine. YOur comment makes no sense https://t.co/VX4NR
@jisanfer @escapist8 @LoboNegro_es @FLMIRONES Conclusion articulo de oxford: https://t.co/gMczVPg4qM https://t.co/c7DXBn8HsD
Bitte erkennt doch alle endlich die Fakten!
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: https://t.co/oPKRzOf5KU #Massentests wissenschaftlicher Irrweg, ethisch & juristisch verwerflich https://t.co/p9PwKaRB…
@RyanVanHorneCTV @CTVAtlantic Asymptomatic transmission is not significant in the transmission of this virus. But you know that, because you follow the science, right? #NoMoreLockdowns #MeaninglessPCR Stop testing healthy people. Stop quarantining heal
@adolfCP @ItSandorfi @FLMIRONES Está revisado y publicado: https://t.co/W2qoCd85wF
https://t.co/oPKRzOf5KU #Massentests wissenschaftlicher Irrweg, ethisch & juristisch verwerflich https://t.co/p9PwKaRBSt PCR & Massentestung als untauglich ; NIEMANDEN stört's https://t.co/lNVYKfoT8E & https://t.co/cbvXGZOKTh & https://t.co
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: Missed it? 2% of people carry 90% of #COVID19 virus, and roommates are safer than you think - translate this to school…
Missed it? 2% of people carry 90% of #COVID19 virus, and roommates are safer than you think - translate this to schools! https://t.co/dGRoHXVI6q We must end vitious masstesting-quarantine/lockdown circle and focus on infectious viral load; read here https:
@ccarballo50 Este comercial vende-crece-pelos (n su caso vacunas)solo tiene la función de asustaros. Aquí 1 estudio d Oxford donde demuestran lo fácil q es manipular la PCR para obtener el resultado q quieres. 1 y otra vez decimos q l PCR n es válida para
@EmilioMorenatti Culturizate un poco con oxford: Las fotos estan bien pero para mi son las fotos de un genocidio y a l gente le parece bonito... eso es una puta desgracia apoyada por el pueblo desinformado... https://t.co/gMczVPg4qM
@sergicamara A veure si entens aquest estudi d'oxford lumbreras q et parla de coses q diu el docu. Suposu q tu t'informes de la pseudociència de la Sexta o telecinco com feu tots els covidiotes. https://t.co/gMczVPg4qM
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: https://t.co/Py71kYUKOo #Massentests sind ein wissenschaftlicher Irrweg, ethisch und juristisch verwerflich https://t.…
https://t.co/Py71kYUKOo #Massentests sind ein wissenschaftlicher Irrweg, ethisch und juristisch verwerflich https://t.co/JrvtMYxypz PCR & Massentestung als untauglich beschrieben https://t.co/eMcL0TlBqi & https://t.co/zDRmdr68ht & https://t.co/
@BVerfG 7 von 10 Schüler erschrecken, haben seelische Schäden, völlig unnötig. Aber hey, GG ist sowas von eindeutig: Nur das Leben von Ü70 zählt noch. Sonst nix.
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: @BR24 Bis zu 70% der positiv getesteten Schüler sind doch negativ https://t.co/lOiz2CtiDx EXPERTEN: #massentests = wi…
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: Missed it? 2% of people carry 90% of #COVID19 virus, and roommates are safer than you think - translate this to school…
@_anapastor_ @SchrodingerGata @Newtral A ver si vuestra nueva fichaje habla de ciencia real y explica como las PCR no són aptas para diagnosticar el cvid. Ya que va de enteradilla que me comente este estudio de Oxford: https://t.co/gMczVPxFik
@Hollywood1114 @statomattic @tinapj3 Ask em how many read oxford’s study. My wife didn’t and she didn’t know how many cycles then and now. https://t.co/tclkFy5wom
Missed it? 2% of people carry 90% of #COVID19 virus, and roommates are safer than you think - translate this to schools! https://t.co/3zGetNt8sf We must end vitious masstesting-quarantine/lockdown circle and focus on infectious viral load; read here https:
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: Ct-Wert: Wir müssen PCR-Tests genauer auswerten https://t.co/nu3pXBNHwU ERSCHRECKEN! Seit MONATEN wird PCR & Massente…
@alessandricci Fonte: una revisione sistematica della letteratura. https://t.co/PZiTyX7VJQ
@DrYolandaK @remmbermytitans @DrJenGunter models fail thinking everyone projects same amount of infectiousness/susceptibility. A positive PCR doesn't mean 'infectious case' https://t.co/qCo5OzC3x3
@remmbermytitans @DrYolandaK @DrJenGunter Went to neighbors house last night, 3 of 5 fully vaxed, 1 recovered/immune-1 not vaxed (spouse of recovered)-if he didn't get it from CLOSE PROLONGED contact from spouse he's prob not getting it (&def NOT FROM
@angrybklynmom https://t.co/qCo5OzC3x3 SHows the BS of "asymptomatic" spread. But it's not from the "approved" scientists so must be wrong I guess
@TwoMoreWeeksPhd @TheEliKlein because PCR tests are bullshit in many cases https://t.co/qCo5OzC3x3
@Wonteegee @TheEliKlein problem is he is NOT following ANY science on this. Period. https://t.co/TyhyrnowQ2 https://t.co/qCo5OzC3x3
RT @IkNet: @WybrenvanHaga @CarlaPeeters3 @TPOnl Een ander onderzoek https://t.co/CUbCO9JIsc concludeerde dat: “complete live viruses are ne…
@WybrenvanHaga @CarlaPeeters3 @TPOnl Een ander onderzoek https://t.co/CUbCO9JIsc concludeerde dat: “complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR-test.” Dus met een positieve test zonder klachten besmettelijk zi
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: Ct-Wert: Wir müssen PCR-Tests genauer auswerten https://t.co/nu3pXBNHwU ERSCHRECKEN! Seit MONATEN wird PCR & Massente…
Ct-Wert: Wir müssen PCR-Tests genauer auswerten https://t.co/nu3pXBNHwU ERSCHRECKEN! Seit MONATEN wird PCR & Massentestung als untauglich beschrieben - NIEMANDEN stört's https://t.co/tKq6aCPdYO & https://t.co/ZsGSO3xSC1 & https://t.co/9OFOLY4x
@DrSlumpdeRoures @FAQSTV3 Oxford per posar 1 exemple de molts més, ja va dir q les PCR s'estan utilitzan malament en aqest estudi: https://t.co/gMczVPxFik
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: @janoschdahmen @Die_Gruenen Wenn irgendjemand bei Euch wissenschaftlich vorgebildet ist, sollte er diese Referenzen ge…
@MCORLEONE1902 @MostTuitero @SergioRamos Las PCR no son buenas para diagnóstico por si solas. La estafa PCR está más que demostrada pero nos siguen masacrando con sus falsos positivos... Oxford: https://t.co/gMczVPg4qM
@eldiarioes Oxford: https://t.co/gMczVPg4qM
RT @Bobby_Network: @c_drosten Gutes neues peer reviewed Paper Herr Drosten (der non-24-hours-category), schon gelesen? Oder lesen Sie immer…
Qui, invece, un altro riferimento dell'ottimo @Zippo88lrr che cita uno studio del prof Heneghan di Oxford sempre sullo stesso tema. https://t.co/NLoom7NSie
RT @PerpetualValue: Also see this study from Oxford: “Two studies reported the odds of live virus culture reduced by approximately 33% for…
RT @PerpetualValue: Also see this study from Oxford: “Two studies reported the odds of live virus culture reduced by approximately 33% for…
RT @PerpetualValue: Also see this study from Oxford: “Two studies reported the odds of live virus culture reduced by approximately 33% for…
RT @PerpetualValue: Also see this study from Oxford: “Two studies reported the odds of live virus culture reduced by approximately 33% for…
RT @PerpetualValue: Also see this study from Oxford: “Two studies reported the odds of live virus culture reduced by approximately 33% for…