↓ Skip to main content

Socially selected ornaments influence hormone titers of signalers and receivers

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
7 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Socially selected ornaments influence hormone titers of signalers and receivers
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2016
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1602707113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth A. Tibbetts, Katherine Crocker, Zachary Y. Huang, Tibbetts, Elizabeth A, Crocker, Katherine, Huang, Zachary Y

Abstract

Decades of behavioral endocrinology research have shown that hormones and behavior have a bidirectional relationship; hormones both influence and respond to social behavior. In contrast, hormones are often thought to have a unidirectional relationship with ornaments. Hormones influence ornament development, but little empirical work has tested how ornaments influence hormones throughout life. Here, we experimentally alter a visual signal of fighting ability in Polistes dominulus paper wasps and measure the behavioral and hormonal consequences of signal alteration in signalers and receivers. We find wasps that signal inaccurately high fighting ability receive more aggression than controls and receiving aggression reduces juvenile hormone (JH) titers. As a result, immediately after contests, inaccurate signalers have lower JH titers than controls. Ornaments also directly influence rival JH titers. Three hours after contests, wasps who interacted with rivals signaling high fighting ability have higher JH titers than wasps who interacted with rivals signaling low fighting ability. Therefore, ornaments influence hormone titers of both signalers and receivers. We demonstrate that relationships between hormones and ornaments are flexible and bidirectional rather than static and unidirectional. Dynamic relationships among ornaments, behavior, and physiology may be an important, but overlooked factor in the evolution of honest communication.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Romania 1 5%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 30%
Researcher 6 30%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Master 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 55%
Psychology 2 10%
Philosophy 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2016.
All research outputs
#312,020
of 8,156,965 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#7,168
of 46,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,238
of 259,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#313
of 935 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,156,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 935 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.