RT @ClareCraigPath: AZ issued a press release claiming 100% efficacy against hospitalisation and death after only 2 severe covid hospitalis…
RT @ClareCraigPath: AZ issued a press release claiming 100% efficacy against hospitalisation and death after only 2 severe covid hospitalis…
RT @ClareCraigPath: AZ issued a press release claiming 100% efficacy against hospitalisation and death after only 2 severe covid hospitalis…
RT @ClareCraigPath: AZ issued a press release claiming 100% efficacy against hospitalisation and death after only 2 severe covid hospitalis…
RT @ClareCraigPath: AZ issued a press release claiming 100% efficacy against hospitalisation and death after only 2 severe covid hospitalis…
RT @ClareCraigPath: AZ issued a press release claiming 100% efficacy against hospitalisation and death after only 2 severe covid hospitalis…
RT @ClareCraigPath: AZ issued a press release claiming 100% efficacy against hospitalisation and death after only 2 severe covid hospitalis…
RT @ClareCraigPath: AZ issued a press release claiming 100% efficacy against hospitalisation and death after only 2 severe covid hospitalis…
RT @ClareCraigPath: AZ issued a press release claiming 100% efficacy against hospitalisation and death after only 2 severe covid hospitalis…
RT @ClareCraigPath: AZ issued a press release claiming 100% efficacy against hospitalisation and death after only 2 severe covid hospitalis…
RT @ClareCraigPath: AZ issued a press release claiming 100% efficacy against hospitalisation and death after only 2 severe covid hospitalis…
RT @ClareCraigPath: AZ issued a press release claiming 100% efficacy against hospitalisation and death after only 2 severe covid hospitalis…
AZ issued a press release claiming 100% efficacy against hospitalisation and death after only 2 severe covid hospitalisations and one death in the placebo arm. This claim was repeated widely and was believed. https://t.co/kejFYFXeBm https://t.co/FoP3e1x
@jheathnb @jason_willz1 @rt7683 @MerjaTuulikki1 @SureshK42242599 The study isn't a randomized trial. It's a retrospective cohort study. We get that you have no clue what that means, non-expert crypto bro. 😉 "retrospective cohort study" https://t.co/olVTr
@GauSemFronteira @EuAdrianoALFF @araujo15886068 @MarceloCRedeTV Não vou fazer assinatura pra discutir com terraplanista. Temos acesso ao melhor da ciência de graça, que prova a eficácia das vacinas. Toma um artigo de alta qualidade. Vê se aprende o que é c
consists of a replication-deficient chimpanzee adenoviral vector ChAdOx1, containing the SARS-CoV-2 structural surface glycoprotein antigen (spike protein; nCoV-19) gene. https://t.co/EDFbPoC1cN
@Adhith50128008 @theliverdr Which vaccine data do you want? Astra Zeneca - https://t.co/GH3AjixlJl
@balkraix @xstoicunicornx As you likely already figured out, they're a sealion operating in bad faith. No amount of evidence is ever going to persuade them. https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc https://t.co/xPNg5zjlvY
RT @Dre5den: “Following initiation of a phase 1 clinical trial in the UK (COV001) on April 23, 2020, three further randomised controlled tr…
@AtConsent @PShow073 @JesslovesMJK You were already cited published evidence on them being true. You're just a deceitful conspiracy theorist + vaccine denialist, so no amount of evidence will ever get through to you. 🤷♂️ Again: https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc h
@AtConsent @MaraGreengrass @gorskon @DrSusanOliver1 Your continued dishonesty is noted. Again: Passive reporting systems are not appropriate for causal inference. Controlled studies, active surveillance, etc. are appropriate, and show vaccines to be safe
@AtConsent @MaraGreengrass @gorskon Let me know what you non-expert vaccine denialists finally learn basic concepts like "statistical significance" and "confidence intervals". You can't bluff your way through science topics you're willfully ignorant on si
@libraltexan @MaraGreengrass @gorskon That's nice, non-expert vaccine denialist. https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc
@KtownWldd @HeyNurseKat @GringoGranadino @jonathanstea 2/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? h
@Eddie1771369 @AnnadeBuisseret Nooope. That trial long since published thanks. https://t.co/ZcgC0AOYnB
@rhok0 @JeffD38 @VigilantFox 1Moderna COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial: https://t.co/Yh4ttj63n2 2Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial: https://t.co/zSatRHVdp8 3AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial: https://t.co/M5RDQzlLPr
@Jikkyleaks @mottomeneki @P_McCulloughMD @pfizer @US_FDA @TrialsiteN @HHSGov @Kevin_McKernan her glowing reviews of Astrazeneca & other vaxxes https://t.co/fcGz02NkQ7 https://t.co/jfNoNjxPCh https://t.co/eJGFNAI2uO https://t.co/sy5csZmyd3 https://t.c
@Casey151170 @judysimpson222 @harry_temp @BreezerGalway @KITTYKAT99 @DavidPNoble63 @DrSusanOliver1 @R Lol You do realise the trial data is obsolete now? https://t.co/9IDQXgj9NW
RT @gyan_chakshu: @ANI Pregnant women were excluded from Astra Zeneca trials. See doc below : "All studies excluded pregnant and breastfe…
RT @gyan_chakshu: @ANI Pregnant women were excluded from Astra Zeneca trials. See doc below : "All studies excluded pregnant and breastfe…
@polindromes @DAVIDXIVERMECT1 @natho47 La ignorancia es atrevida. Pero aún así te explicaré con manzanitas. Mira, este estudio recorrió los medios de noticias a nivel mundial como prueba de la seguridad y eficacia de una vacuna covid-19: https://t.co/pusrN
Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK - The Lancet https://t.co/n9Si4didim
12/21 Se você ainda não está satisfeito, também pode ir conferir os artigos da AstraZeneca (inclusive dos estudos que incluíram os brasileiros) https://t.co/s2q43ngXMB https://t.co/UoumecCnWW Ou da Janssen tbm https://t.co/eTaHXl4ViL E da CovLP https://t.c
@EduardoSprinz É preocupante sim,especialmente para os peões da BIG PHARMA. https://t.co/Zok7ahlWcs https://t.co/HNusfbbIhB
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
@diogomartinez Este artigo cita o Brasil. Tem mais. https://t.co/qeLl9hi8m1
@jason_willz1 @ErikaJK1016 @HeyNurseKat @rt7683 It's always telling when the non-expert vaccine denialists show their true colors (ex: on case reports). So many of them have been attracted to Prasad's contrarian antics. https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc
@Noga_IHSV @DRobertaLacerda Da astrazeneca Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK https://t.co/JIInQAvpgy
@VegtDoor Hoe toevallig is dat? Coronavaccins worden getest in Zuid-Afrika, India, Brazilië en UK. En kort daarop volgen de 'varianten' met dezelfde namen. Zuid-Afrika, Brazilië en UK vanaf april 2020. https://t.co/lLFwbc9Ifu Covishield in India (delta va
@MikeK634 @TheDrJon So NONE of the vaccine developers followed correct process? Care to show where? AZ https://t.co/m9SVN5kSWA Moderna https://t.co/vBgEvdZBB3 Novavax https://t.co/rMWGlmTmgp Pfizer https://t.co/smUnBRnd2N
@LongLester @HeyNurseKat @jonathanstea Here are 3 that were done before the vaccine was approved. https://t.co/oncK71h3HE https://t.co/C3mgIumwb5 https://t.co/FtULfFnlI1
@CastorT26371809 That's nice, non-expert vaccine denialist + sealion. The points were already covered, regardless of how much your paranoia + sealioning lead you to pretend otherwise. So going to ignore your evidence-free conspiracism now. 🙂 https://t.c
@CarlaPeeters3 Hallo Indiase of Delta variant. Bronnen: https://t.co/lLFwbc9Ifu https://t.co/ZVkHTfqmzZ https://t.co/iPJULo5wDn
@JimGleeson Stop being disingenuous. You know full-well that you're going to reject any evidence you're cited on the vaccine-mediated response being better on things like risk of severe COVID-19, risk of COVID-19 death, etc. https://t.co/7jUp97tk3u http
@JimGleeson None of your evidence-free non-expert musings rebuts published RCT evidence on the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. https://t.co/7jUp97tk3u https://t.co/geFpUdJooj https://t.co/pNDpqC1fCq
@JimGleeson None of your baseless paranoia, willful ignorance of published evidence on vaccines + immunology, etc., addresses the evidence that shows you're wrong. In fact, you're just tone trolling. https://t.co/BNUZ2tzIpx https://t.co/ki8mAR4iCl https
@JimGleeson You don't have a cogent argument. You just have the standard vaccine denialist tricks of making things up without evidence, engaging in baseless conspiracism to evade evidence that shows you're wrong, refusing to learn basic immunology, etc.
@JimGleeson Sorry, I'm not interested in your evidence-free paranoid conspiracy theories meant to evade the fact that vaccines passed phase 3 RCTs and are thus by definition not experimental (RCTs are experiments). https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc https://t.co/3C
@JimGleeson You tried this lie of your's already. They passed phase 3 RCTs, so they're not experimental. They work via standard immunological mechanisms, and it's those mechanisms that preclude effects from waiting to appear until the long-term. https://
@JimGleeson Re: "Clinical trials for most vaccines go on for years." Thanks for showing you don't know the difference between phase 3 vs. phase 4. Vaccines passed phase 3 RCTs, so they're not experimental, regardless of how much you pretend otherwise. h
@JimGleeson @gorskon COVID-19 vaccines passed phase 3 randomized controlled trials, and are thus not experimental. But thank you for continuing to repeat long-debunked vaccine denialist tropes. It shows how unreasonable + beyond help you are. 🙂 https://t
@BryceKnechtel @HeyNurseKat @jestdeserts @Martina @mcgilead 2/ https://t.co/FtULfFnlI1 Speaking of control groups, are you suggesting that scientists should have intentionally exposed people to the virus? Please explain how that is ethical.
@plumber_dragon @HeyNurseKat @DrCanuckMD @jonathanstea 4/ Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h3HE https://t.co/C3mgIumwb5 https://t.co/FtULfFnlI1
@joshux321 @dr_jon_l @jason_willz1 @andrewbostom What study? No, a non-peer-reviewed Substack article from a non-expert paranoid crackpot like Fenton is not a "study". https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc
@weleesewodewick @egyptiankinghk @sid8998 Re: "as you make a SUPPOSITION" The impact of vaccination of risk of COVID-19 death + risk of severe disease is evidence-based, in both controlled studies and outside of them. https://t.co/7jUp97tRT2 https://t.c
@UndercoverFBI9 @HeyNurseKat @MichellePeterNP @healthbyjames 2/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree
@LovemycountrySd @WeHaveNoRights2 @Captaincoby00 Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https:
@john_bumblebee En toen kwamen de varianten. Die werden heel toevallig gevonden in de landen waar geëxperimenteerd is met de 'coronavaccins'. De Zuid-Afrikaanse, Braziliaanse, Britse en Indiase variant.. Allemaal testlanden van AstraZeneca. https://t.co/l
@canab1111 @RachelNotley 2/Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/sXvXxvi7XP http
@Archeygoddess1 @CanadaStrong73 @tarabibarati @Captaincoby00 2/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree
@GermangirlT @ButHisEmails @SwaledaleMutton @btcgrant @Doctor_Eric_B 3/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you
@subbraa1 Another lie that was published on December 8th. NOw dont waste my time. https://t.co/8UnIMnIHWs
@7sealshortime @hammers43000966 @MagicMerlinV @TRN1993 @DavidJuurlink Did you even read the original trials? Here I will link it for you
@ford546_ford @dr_jon_l @DrAseemMalhotra @BBCBreaking 7/ Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h3HE https://t.co/C3mgIumwb5 https://t.co/FtULfFnlI1 Let's start here. I want
@svensrevenge @1Patriot4All @DrJamesOlsson Paid for science. Your favourite pubmed, declared it safe and efficacaous. Before injecting 50 million doses of it into any “bloody clots” daft enough, UK alone. To then decide down the line. Yea, bit dangerous
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
@Cvorovici @ZvicerMaja @adzo83 Koje od 50 odobrenih nisu ispitane i 242 u povoju? 1. Sve vakcine https://t.co/cLOnz9ZNQH 2. Pfizer-BioNtech BNT162b2 https://t.co/LSVTXT8WVI 3. Astrazeneca AZD1222 https://t.co/84JUJ9J5NK 4. Astrazeneca https://t.co/p5WUY0j
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
@VonMaunder @FionnMacCool @TrollAdopt @PlainJaneDoe17 @Puppieskitts @HeyNurseKat @jason_willz1 @rt7683 @P_McCulloughMD Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. W
@tinacostamac @LunaBella128 @DrAseemMalhotra @MattHancock @RishiSunak 1 - That is an anti-Ad response also seen after Ad infection 2 - They didn't order any more because it is less effective as a 2nd/3rd dose 3 - https://t.co/i7VSvG2ZXg 4 - Nope. You have
@EmilyPetro22 @Covid19Ls @mauveTriforce @Brkr_Morant @1776Dairenn @zipsmooch @BogusBones208 @LobotomizedM1 @GYamey @InCytometry @MaryanneDemasi We've already had controlled studies on this topic that account for confounders. But I understand that the evid
@EmilyPetro22 @mauveTriforce @Brkr_Morant @1776Dairenn @Covid19Ls @zipsmooch @BogusBones208 @LobotomizedM1 @GYamey @InCytometry @MaryanneDemasi The source of the images are linked already for you, despite you repeatedly pretending otherwise. If you want t
@AmyTaylorTx @kiley_christina 2/ lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h3HE https://t.co/C3mgIumwb5 https://t.co/FtULfFnlI1 >>>
RT @gyan_chakshu: @speakshoutroar @NandyAsmita @OfficialSauravD U r right. Logical ppl should’ve questioned y V@x was administered indiscri…
@speakshoutroar @NandyAsmita @OfficialSauravD U r right. Logical ppl should’ve questioned y V@x was administered indiscriminately on popn not represented in trials (naturally immune/pregnant women/lactating Moms). Did u question? https://t.co/JOg8D1ibg5
@Jfleming7777 @TigerlillySusan @Foot_House_ @AlexBerenson You don't seem to know what "chemokines" are, nor the role they play in normal cell migration. Random unsourced claims you hear on Twitter regarding chemokines you don't understand, doesn't trump c