@MinorityView @mauveTriforce @KopkaGregor @Brkr_Morant @WestsydeServer @thereal_truther @InCytometry @TrishtheDish_7 @Covid19Ls @LobotomizedM1 @snorman1776 @MAKEnotMIKE @GYamey @MaryanneDemasi You're continuing to expose yourself as a non-expert vaccine de
@Jfleming7777 @TigerlillySusan @Foot_House_ @AlexBerenson So you simply believed a tweet with no cited data, using terms you likely do not understand (ex: CCL5 / RANTES are just chemokines, meaning they help cells migrate to a location). Pointing out thos
@DKshad0w @BlairRuby123 @NPR Similar to how vaccinations' impact of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (a pre-requisite for COVID-19 deaths) showed up in controlled trials + outside of them. https://t.co/p46bqlsvJa https://t.co/7jUp97tk3u https://t.co/W5CgH
@metabasu @DKshad0w @c0nc0rdance @elonmusk @hot_rod_co Nowhere in your evidence-free ranting did you actually cite any evidence. That's a common trope among non-expert contrarian ideologues; pretend they're just asking questions about evidence, but *never
@CovidianCritic @HammersBagga @CKellyUAP Then explain how AstraZeneca vaccine where the trials did measure protection against infection found it to protect against infection https://t.co/HETlleOzcy
@The_Reality_1 @Cam_Knoll @mrd2103 @samanthamarika1 The trial data had to go through peer review to be published.
@ilgiocane @astynis @vaccinologie @Alexa2B74 @oqaqiq @emmanueldessole Avec le tps le dtpolio a montré son efficacité or il a été moins testé que le anticovid... Démerde toi : -https://t.co/wkUybUFo5p -https://t.co/DwAv4Iq60E -https://t.co/LMwEgvZCmR -https
@Staninsd @QuranDon @samanthamarika1 There were multiple phases of study in multiple countries for multiple vaccines. This is easy to find for yourself: https://t.co/pnzjV7rTdj
Link - AZ, naturally immune were excluded from trials https://t.co/qG54B75w2B
@jabber_no @drmssm The burden of proof lies on those who recommend the jab for subgroups excluded from clinical trials. https://t.co/YF7hYsPC5G
@JCOOutdoors @DrJamesOlsson Which ones are you looking for? Here are just 3 of the phase 3 studies used as part of the approval process. https://t.co/oncK71h3HE https://t.co/C3mgIumwb5 https://t.co/FtULfFnlI1 >>
@TrishtheDish_7 @Hoodie_Weather1 @ButHisEmails @HeyNurseKat @dr_jon_l @TheEliKlein 4/ What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK70YUtw https://t.co/C3mgIuDzd5 https://t.co/FtULfF5ctT
@fabioalzx @DogBone06987811 Malária não é causada por vírus. Antibiótico também não é efetivo contra vírus. A HCQ poderia ser utilizada há MILHARES de anos e mesmo assim isso não a tornaria eficaz contra a Covid-19. Astrazeneca - https://t.co/53nCRHGAh2 Pf
@zcarbon58 @ButHisEmails @MotrinRn @jayrodfudge @Doctor_Eric_B Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree
@zcarbon58 @ButHisEmails @MotrinRn @jayrodfudge @Doctor_Eric_B Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree
@ORLANDOHARESEN1 @alfredo_cunha @JorgeSeifNeto @valuationfstyle Mas cadê que eles dizem que a probabilidade de morrer de Covid é menor do que de ser atropelado? Nos testes fase 3 da Vacina Oxford/AstraZeneca morreu mais gente atropelado do que de COVID-19
RT @_chAyA_: @advait108 @shri_v in your book what does "much bigger sample" mean? you want to give the JAB to many more healthy folks betwe…
@jembendell @BretWeinstein @chrismartenson @MichaNarberhaus To check vaccination's impact on mortality, you compare vaccinated to unvaccinated, while accounting for confounders. Your don't simply assume, without supporting evidence/reasoning, that any exce
RT @_chAyA_: @advait108 @shri_v in your book what does "much bigger sample" mean? you want to give the JAB to many more healthy folks betwe…
@advait108 @shri_v in your book what does "much bigger sample" mean? you want to give the JAB to many more healthy folks between 18-55 years of age, then check if they are getting heart issues? #heartless https://t.co/7qWgTmYjjj "Inclusion Criteria Healthy
@SagasofBharat @advait108 @iamshinerk @RudraaShiv @D_Desert_thorn @DrAseemMalhotra @shri_v https://t.co/7qWgTmYjjj . Recipients of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 do not have any guaranteed benefit. However, it is hoped that the information gained from this study will con
@DeeEternalOpt @AgentSaffron @shri_v https://t.co/7qWgTmYjjj Recipients of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 do not have any guaranteed benefit, however it is hoped that the information gained from this study will contribute to the development of a safe and effective vaccin
@shri_v @thrishul @gganeshhh @BLRrocKS https://t.co/52jZCY7GY0 lancet, 2020
RT @sborg40: 19.“In AstraZeneca’s trials, 86% of the controls did not receive placebo but another vaccine, which means that the harms of it…
RT @sborg40: 19.“In AstraZeneca’s trials, 86% of the controls did not receive placebo but another vaccine, which means that the harms of it…
@punal100 @CKRKKVG @PhilSmi50602350 @FitzChivalry14 @whowatwherewolf https://t.co/52jZCY8eNy Govt of India: The overall safety of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca [ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Corona Virus Vaccine (Recombinant)] is based on an interim analysis of pooled da
19.“In AstraZeneca’s trials, 86% of the controls did not receive placebo but another vaccine, which means that the harms of its COVID-19 vaccine cannot be estimated, as all vaccines cause harm” https://t.co/SznBntTDoT
RT @_chAyA_: @DeeEternalOpt @OpIndia_com @UnSubtleDesi @covid_info_IND https://t.co/52jZCY8eNy there is no guaranteed benefit says AZ trial…
@DeeEternalOpt @OpIndia_com @UnSubtleDesi @covid_info_IND https://t.co/52jZCY8eNy there is no guaranteed benefit says AZ trial document published in LANCET in 2020... will you atleast wake up now.. nah!!!
@Brkr_Morant @Alex_on_A14 @thereal_truther @mauveTriforce @GYamey @InCytometry @MaryanneDemasi Because vaccine efficacy is determined in studies with a control group, not by an incompetent non-expert ideologue looking at 1 curve without accounting for conf
RT @_chAyA_: Recipients of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 do not have any guaranteed benefit, however it is hoped that the information gained from this st…
RT @_chAyA_: 18 years and older were randomly assigned (1:1) to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine or control (meningococcal group A, C, W, and Y conj…
RT @_chAyA_: Recipients of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 do not have any guaranteed benefit, however it is hoped that the information gained from this st…
Recipients of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 do not have any guaranteed benefit, however it is hoped that the information gained from this study will contribute to the development of a safe and effective vaccine against COVID-19 https://t.co/7qWgTmYjjj
@Dr_of_Lifestyle @kirti_sd @DrVW30 yes, clear your mind of wrong notions and read this "Transient neutropenia, lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia has been described following immunization with other adenoviral-vectored vaccines, and is not perceived to be of
@anikghosh @Tarangini_das47 please read AZ trial document https://t.co/KcyUKsAN1j "Transient neutropenia, lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia has been described following immunization with other adenoviral-vectored vaccines " https://t.co/7qWgTnfUaR
RT @_chAyA_: 18 years and older were randomly assigned (1:1) to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine or control (meningococcal group A, C, W, and Y conj…
Indeed that is the case....always been.
RT @_chAyA_: 18 years and older were randomly assigned (1:1) to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine or control (meningococcal group A, C, W, and Y conj…
RT @_chAyA_: 18 years and older were randomly assigned (1:1) to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine or control (meningococcal group A, C, W, and Y conj…
RT @_chAyA_: 18 years and older were randomly assigned (1:1) to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine or control (meningococcal group A, C, W, and Y conj…
RT @_chAyA_: 18 years and older were randomly assigned (1:1) to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine or control (meningococcal group A, C, W, and Y conj…
Transient neutropenia, lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia has been described following immunization with other adenoviral-vectored vaccines, and is not perceived to be of clinical significance. https://t.co/KcyUKsAN1j
what are the diff ways medical trials are fudged? a) giving another jab instead of saline b) running trials out of season c) classification on who is considered "immune".. d) ?
@dr_ouken @KnKsnksm0 @jabber_no sm post? go check lancet study written in plain english! all u know is name calling and shrilling for pig bharma🤣 https://t.co/qETo6JWmsZ
RT @_chAyA_: 18 years and older were randomly assigned (1:1) to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine or control (meningococcal group A, C, W, and Y conj…
18 years and older were randomly assigned (1:1) to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine or control (meningococcal group A, C, W, and Y conjugate vaccine or saline). - medical trials are gamed? .. instead of saline they compare AEs between 2 diff jabs?.. lol https://t.c
More data on safety of covishield. #heartattack https://t.co/Y8p7U3tohP
@colleen4685 @Frazzling @RonOrrMLA @RealNotRare @Answers4Sean 5/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagre
@jason_guilbault @ZombiApocolypse @TheMars13959760 @HealthNatural9 @complexsimon @ThevoiceAlexa 3/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the anal
@Mattmur02987686 @MSkrzat @ThevoiceAlexa 2/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co
@Jazz777zzzz @ThevoiceAlexa Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h3HE htt
@HalBrohart @SullivanMonty1 @ThevoiceAlexa Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/
@chknfckrbeegack @ThevoiceAlexa 2/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h3
@JamesLadbroke @daleylo @CMO_England No. She is quoting this study. There were no Covid-19 hospitalizations or deaths in the vaccine arm (11,636 trial volunteers) https://t.co/5ZbvSTBLnh
Did u read the courts forced trials? They didnt start the never used in human synthetic mrna & LNP trial till a few months B4 rollout. Did see that they lost track of the PPL in the study & ended up giving the placebo group the jab, so they lost
@Speaking4m AZ, Testing on humans: https://t.co/bTgfXItVZ2 Pfizer, Testing on humans (one of many trials): https://t.co/0in87qksny You know you are lying or deluded right?
@JamieBullard18 @captainwonkish @WhiteRussianSpy @Rockenjud 2/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree
@dave1again1 @Rockenjud 2/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h3HE http
@popandbob @Lou00Jaffe @RachelNotley 2/ https://t.co/FtULfFnlI1 These were just 3 of the Phase 3 studies. But you are claiming "small, limited" tests"? No. You clearly haven't looked into the tests that were done before approval. >>>
@baonao10671 @ohdarn1984 @Lou00Jaffe @RachelNotley 2/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? h
RT @AtomsksSanakan: Let me know when you have data analysis from a reliable source supporting your claims. When controlled studies are don…
Let me know when you have data analysis from a reliable source supporting your claims. When controlled studies are done where the vaccination + unvaccinated groups come from the same time period, the vaccinated groups does better on COVID-19. https://t.c
#CrimesAgainstHumanity #Pfizer Do you get it yet? https://t.co/XyUp7cC44y
RT @revoltes: Les essais du vaccin #AstraZeneca ont été faits en Grande-Bretagne, en Afrique du Sud, et au Brésil : https://t.co/waHya2rNFL…
@AndrewDGarrett Good question! The phase III publication only looked at symptomatic infection, presumably because in the other trials which got merged with UK data they weren't performing frequent asymptomatic swabbing So we don't know! https://t.co/Frh
@MPloughboy @JonathanSarfat1 @mpc_xetts @Allconsidered1 @DanielL74952227 @bobbywarnsiii @thereal_truther Oh look, you're making stuff in bad faith again, after you had the nerve to say Christians shouldn't point out vaccine denialism. You should reflect o
@Allconsidered1 @thereal_truther @callanswag2 There are already controlled studies (ex: RCTs) that account for confounders such as NPIs, + which show vaccines are effective. So unless your ecological analysis can answer those 3 questions, including contro
@Allconsidered1 @thereal_truther @callanswag2 What you're doing, @Allconsidered1, is an incompetent ecological analysis that doesn't control for confounders. That is a much weaker that the randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, etc. that show vacci