@WitchDrTim @DrCanuckMD @josbourgault If you don't like the sources that he posts then why not explain why the sources someone else posted are insufficient. You antivaxxers never come with anything intelligent. You just resort to misinformation and name ca
@josbourgault 2/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h3HE https://t.co/
@JamieSale @DrCanuckMD @josbourgault 2/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/on
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
@Jason20413 @JohannaSzabo1 @LarcombePeter @DrAseemMalhotra Here’s a few you won’t read: https://t.co/ctt2YPYDl2 https://t.co/bOvbKfcss2 https://t.co/PB4DuLsDwd
@idrissaberkane Les vaccins préviennent l’infection, c’est connu depuis 2020. Preuve 1: https://t.co/iTaYMRsaX5 2: https://t.co/lDNOdXirZo 3: https://t.co/tBTI9h8GZe 4: https://t.co/AauVMPvRiJ 5: https://t.co/C9GVQORh9Z
@LePoeteCrottey @b_scotto @nuitsanslune31 @idrissaberkane En voilà une autre sinon. Mais peu importe que l’on vous en file 1, 2 ou 10. Vous êtes vissé dans la contradiction… avec quels preuves ? https://t.co/rLeRWZmjng
@MarieBayle77 Pour cet essai-là oui, mais pour d'autres non. Par exemple: https://t.co/srZDxitPU4 https://t.co/4BIA5KnSWT
@PaulBar99715678 @stuartjs74 @BrentLeeSDCIC No, the clinical trials finished in 2020. Vax trials are different to drug trials. Here are all the Phase 3 trial results: Pfizer: https://t.co/Jm64MAgUFh Moderna: https://t.co/MySi1Fq5DO OxAzn: https://t.co/f
@BradLitz2 @TravIsScience @slackingoff3 @Cam_Knoll @HeyNurseKat @scientistabe @JamieSale @SwaledaleMutton 3/ Read this thread again. You have provided NONE of the things I requested. NONE. You fail. https://t.co/mbirzCLwUB
@mentju4 @gtuckerkellogg @TheLegalBrain1 @past_is_future @PeterDaszak @DanielPrantner Anyway, controlled studies on ivermectin were conducted for years before the pandemic, allowing one to know what side effects it causes. Still waiting on a certain vacci
@BradLitz2 @TravIsScience @slackingoff3 @Cam_Knoll @HeyNurseKat @scientistabe @JamieSale @SwaledaleMutton 2/Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of
@mentju4 @gtuckerkellogg @TheLegalBrain1 @past_is_future @PeterDaszak @DanielPrantner I already told you what I meant in bright orange. You're simply pretend not to see it, as expected of a dishonest denialist like you. Let me know when you actually read
@mentju4 @gtuckerkellogg @TheLegalBrain1 @past_is_future @PeterDaszak @DanielPrantner All of your trolling on this, @mentju4, is to help you avoid higher-quality studies on vaccines being safe. You cherry-picking from lower on the evidence pyramid to evad
@mentju4 @gtuckerkellogg @TheLegalBrain1 @past_is_future @PeterDaszak @DanielPrantner Actually, it does. Causation in medical science isn't determined by cherry-picking individual unverified anecdotes / case reports. Instead we use studies with a *control
@mentju4 @gtuckerkellogg @TheLegalBrain1 @past_is_future @PeterDaszak @DanielPrantner Re: "is she lying?" Unlike a non-expert conspiracy theorist who falls for denialist nonsense on vaccines, ivermectin, pathogen origins, etc., I don't get my information
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
@Dharmmabro @zoeharcombe Finally AZ - reported 10 cases hospitalized for covid19. All in control arm https://t.co/eLSmHgpVhq
@NickHunt5 @LyquidPirate @GBates76034889 @VikiLovesFACS @EricTopol @TimTruth123 @EnigmasTellKit @rotor_motor13b @bedworthlad72 @nuhope2022 @arkmedic @Joe09396262 @JiminyC24 @SSZ1967 @AstraZeneca Oh buddy. Those are the ends of the STUDY period, not the TRI
@CitizenNewsCha1 Heck that's all REAL WORLD independently sourced data and evidence showing they work - but we've known since Dec 2020 when the trials finished. How long have you been hiding in your safe space exactly? So funny with your profile pic. You
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
@LadyNaomiRoss @RachelNotley 2/Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? > https://t.co/oncK71h
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
@hibbsy1973 @AnnieWBelle There is loads of stuff out there, this is an interim analysis of phase 1-2 data https://t.co/bkNyHKlzSg
@dgurdasani1 To be noted that no vaccine had a primary endpoint of efficacy for asymptomatic infection, only for symptomatic. This was properly assessed only in a part of the AstraZeneca trial, and more preliminarily in the Moderna trial. https://t.co/Za
@MyFrontRowSeat @Loretta_Torrago @DGBassani @FLSurgeonGen Re: ""Placebo" does not mean 'saline' or 'sugar water' it means whatever concoction" Like plenty of your fellow vaccine denialists, you're deceitful. So feel free to just go away. You have nothing
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
RT @SimonElmer2022: In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published…
In December 2020, an interim analysis of trials of the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ was published in The Lancet. Among the funders of the trial was the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and AstraZeneca itself. https://t.co/Kh8Ax67pE
@John22051340 @crabb_vicki @HerHalo3 @lindsaylohanxox @The_Seeadler @DeannaMariaR1 @alisonpalk @tripl3zer0_ @tnicholsmd @momanoms2 @unhealthytruth The 2020 trials covered some 120,000 people for the main three vaccines used in our nations. Phase 3 trial r
@Riolionel44 @egion35 @bitchwitch1969 @Jakarhan @galsene_du93 @wargonm Publication des résultats de la phase 3 le 9 décembre 2020, sur plus de 25.000 patients en cohorte : https://t.co/jr7jtegbmr donc phase 3 terminée, pas d'ATU.
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @JonathanSarfat1 @disclosetv Case reports are lower on the evidence pyramid and less reliable for causal inference, whi…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @JonathanSarfat1 @disclosetv Case reports are lower on the evidence pyramid and less reliable for causal inference, whi…
@JonathanSarfat1 @disclosetv Case reports are lower on the evidence pyramid and less reliable for causal inference, which is one reason why vaccine denialists love abusing them so much. https://t.co/4fpLaVZk6C https://t.co/OZsN0A577E https://t.co/ukWQRAg
@disclosetv From study on one of his vaxzines "Funding UK Research and Innovation, National Institutes for Health Research (NIHR), Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and AstraZeneca...among others."https://t.co/rJDPDEXlXP
@RadTours @ApplauseSv From whose where it is coming only time will tell. https://t.co/uaKqCmGrl4
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
We would all love an update @CarolineBlaine
@Mark29970402 @BlueLionBlog @Debunk_the_Funk @hildabast That's what informed experts do when they want to figure out whether a vaccine works, @Mark29970402: They compare vaccinated vs. unvaccinated, while accounting for confounding. https://t.co/xvm6PBIS
@Mark29970402 @BlueLionBlog @Debunk_the_Funk @hildabast This, for example, is clearly vaccine denialism: "The vaccines don't look to be doing anything" https://t.co/q4FYISEljl But one can't expect much better from FirstNameBunchOfNumbers. 🤷♂️ https://t
@dataOverFear1 @MattHancock Repeating yourself now. The very basic principles of physics tell us masks work. The vaccines are based on amazing evidence. Get back to me when you find an IVM trial to match these: https://t.co/R3F0ePuw0x https://t.co/ZcgC0AO
@J_Miguelinho @BritainFree @ftrjackhackett @KevinRampling @mk_hostile17 @KagsyforPM @SteveBarclay All the placebo details are listed in the reports. https://t.co/pgvUTGEMJN