You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Liver metastasis restrains immunotherapy efficacy via macrophage-mediated T cell elimination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-020-1131-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiali Yu, Michael D. Green, Shasha Li, Yilun Sun, Sara N. Journey, Jae Eun Choi, Syed Monem Rizvi, Angel Qin, Jessica J. Waninger, Xueting Lang, Zoey Chopra, Issam El Naqa, Jiajia Zhou, Yingjie Bian, Long Jiang, Alangoya Tezel, Jeremy Skvarce, Rohan K. Achar, Merna Sitto, Benjamin S. Rosen, Fengyun Su, Sathiya P. Narayanan, Xuhong Cao, Shuang Wei, Wojciech Szeliga, Linda Vatan, Charles Mayo, Meredith A. Morgan, Caitlin A. Schonewolf, Kyle Cuneo, Ilona Kryczek, Vincent T. Ma, Christopher D. Lao, Theodore S. Lawrence, Nithya Ramnath, Fei Wen, Arul M. Chinnaiyan, Marcin Cieslik, Ajjai Alva, Weiping Zou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 396 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 91 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 6% |
| France | 15 | 4% |
| Spain | 10 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 9 | 2% |
| Canada | 8 | 2% |
| Germany | 8 | 2% |
| Brazil | 7 | 2% |
| Italy | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 68 | 17% |
| Unknown | 151 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 201 | 51% |
| Scientists | 135 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 48 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 590 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 590 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 102 | 17% |
| Researcher | 101 | 17% |
| Other | 38 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 5% |
| Other | 87 | 15% |
| Unknown | 196 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 88 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 77 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 57 | 10% |
| Unknown | 224 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 570. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#42,404
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#289
of 9,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,446
of 531,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#18
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.