↓ Skip to main content

The TIDieR checklist will benefit the physiotherapy profession

Overview of attention for article published in Physiotherapy Practice and Research, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The TIDieR checklist will benefit the physiotherapy profession
Published in
Physiotherapy Practice and Research, June 2016
DOI 10.3233/ppr-160080
Authors

Tiê Yamato, Chris Maher, Bruno Saragiotto, Anne Moseley, Tammy Hoffmann, Mark Elkins, Joseph G. McVeigh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Lecturer 2 3%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Student > Master 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 57 80%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Psychology 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Unknown 60 85%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2016.
All research outputs
#21,160,107
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Physiotherapy Practice and Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,644
of 356,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physiotherapy Practice and Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.5. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them