↓ Skip to main content

Ivermectin for onchocercal eye disease (river blindness)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
23 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ivermectin for onchocercal eye disease (river blindness)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002219.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henry OD Ejere, Ellen Schwartz, Richard Wormald, Jennifer R Evans

Abstract

It is believed that ivermectin (a microfilaricide) could prevent blindness due to onchocerciasis. However, when given to everyone in communities where onchocerciasis is common, the effects of ivermectin on lesions affecting the eye are uncertain and data on whether the drug prevents visual loss are unclear.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 135 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 45 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 33%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 45 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,574,456
of 26,794,081 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,135
of 13,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,942
of 188,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,794,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.