Title |
Oatmeal particle size alters glycemic index but not as a function of gastric emptying rate
|
---|---|
Published in |
American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal & Liver Physiology, June 2017
|
DOI | 10.1152/ajpgi.00005.2017 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alan R Mackie, Balazs H Bajka, Neil M Rigby, Peter J Wilde, Fatima Alves-Pereira, Ellen F Mosleth, Anne Rieder, Bente Kirkhus, Louise J Salt |
Abstract |
The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which oat particle size in a porridge could alter glucose absorption, gastric emptying, gastrointestinal hormone response and subjective feelings of appetite and satiety. Porridge was prepared from either oat flakes or oat flour with the same protein, fat, carbohydrate and mass. These were fed to eight volunteers on separate days in a crossover study and subjective appetite ratings, gastric contents and plasma glucose, insulin, and gastrointestinal hormones were determined over a period of three hours. The flake porridge gave a lower glucose response than the flour porridge and there were apparent differences in gastric emptying in both the early and late post prandial phases. The appetite ratings showed similar differences between early and late phase behavior. The structure of the oat flakes remained sufficiently intact to delay their gastric emptying leading to a lower glycemic response, even though initial gastric emptying rates were similar for the flake and flour porridge. This highlights the need to take food structure into account when considering relatively simple physiological measures and offering nutritional guidance. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 7 | 25% |
United States | 4 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
Paraguay | 1 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 11% |
Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
Researcher | 7 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 22 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 28 | 47% |