You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
The AMI Meeting Corpus: A Pre-announcement
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 3 |
| Book title |
Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, July 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/11677482_3 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-54-032549-9, 978-3-54-032550-5
|
| Authors |
Carletta, Jean, Ashby, Simone, Bourban, Sebastien, Flynn, Mike, Guillemot, Mael, Hain, Thomas, Kadlec, Jaroslav, Karaiskos, Vasilis, Kraaij, Wessel, Kronenthal, Melissa, Lathoud, Guillaume, Lincoln, Mike, Lisowska, Agnes, McCowan, Iain, Post, Wilfried, Reidsma, Dennis, Wellner, Pierre, Jean Carletta, Simone Ashby, Sebastien Bourban, Mike Flynn, Mael Guillemot, Thomas Hain, Jaroslav Kadlec, Vasilis Karaiskos, Wessel Kraaij, Melissa Kronenthal, Guillaume Lathoud, Mike Lincoln, Agnes Lisowska, Iain McCowan, Wilfried Post, Dennis Reidsma, Pierre Wellner |
| Editors |
Steve Renals, Samy Bengio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 32% |
| Researcher | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 79 | 56% |
| Engineering | 20 | 14% |
| Linguistics | 10 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 1% |
| Decision Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2019.
All research outputs
#14,243,953
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#4,312
of 8,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,348
of 57,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#42
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.