↓ Skip to main content

In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Before In Vivo Imaging: Evaluation of Fluorescent Probes Using Fluorescence Microscopy, Multiplate Reader, and Cytotoxicity Assays.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Bioconjugation Methods for Coupling Targeting Ligands with Fluorescent Dyes.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 In Vivo Fluorescence Reflectance Imaging with Subcutaneous Mouse Tumor Models.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 FRET Imaging of Enzymatic Activities Using Smart Probes.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Fluorescence Imaging of Inflammation in Live Animals.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging of Cancer In Vivo.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Noninvasive Imaging of Fluorescent Reporters in Small Rodent Models Using Fluorescence Molecular Tomography.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 In Vivo Tumor Angiogenesis Imaging Using Peptide-Based Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probes.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Intraoperative Fluorescence Imaging and Multimodal Surgical Navigation Using Goggle System.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Utilization of Near-Infrared Fluorescent Imaging for Pharmaceutically Relevant Applications.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 In Vivo Cell Tracking Using Two-Photon Microscopy.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Small-Animal Imaging Using Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 In Vivo Metal Ion Imaging Using Fluorescent Sensors.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging in the Second Near-Infrared Window Using Carbon Nanotubes.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Ex Vivo Imaging, Biodistribution, and Histological Study in Addition to In Vivo Imaging.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Experimental Design and Data Analysis of In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging Studies.
Attention for Chapter 14: In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging
Chapter number 14
Book title
In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3721-9_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3719-6, 978-1-4939-3721-9
Authors

Lin, Qiaoya, Huang, Huang, Chen, Juan, Zheng, Gang, Qiaoya Lin, Huang Huang, Juan Chen, Gang Zheng

Editors

Mingfeng Bai

Abstract

Imaging has become an indispensable tool in both clinical medicine and preclinical sciences. It enables doctors to locate sites of cancer/disease, track drug delivery, and guide operative planning, thus enhancing the treatment efficacy. Recently, we developed a multimodal theranostic lipid nanoparticles, named HPPS(NIR)-chol-siRNA with its built-in near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent probe core as a useful surrogate for tracking small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery. By using the image co-registration of computed tomography (CT) and fluorescence molecular tomography (FMT), we achieved noninvasive assessment and treatment planning of siRNA delivery into the orthotopic tumor, thus enabling efficacious RNA interference (RNAi) therapy. In this chapter, we introduce this method to illustrate the use of CT-FMT co-registration for tracking drug delivery and guiding treatment planning in vivo.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 24%
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Bachelor 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 24%
Unspecified 5 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2016.
All research outputs
#18,463,662
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,924
of 13,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,559
of 393,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#846
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.