You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Rabbits.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 140 |
Book title |
Induced Pluripotent Stem (iPS) Cells
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/7651_2014_140 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3054-8, 978-1-4939-3055-5
|
Authors |
Marielle Afanassieff, Yann Tapponnier, Pierre Savatier, Afanassieff, Marielle, Tapponnier, Yann, Savatier, Pierre |
Editors |
Kursad Turksen, Andras Nagy |
Abstract |
We describe a procedure for generating induced pluripotent stem cell lines in rabbits, using retroviral vectors expressing Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc of human origin to reprogram rabbit fibroblasts prepared from an ear skin biopsy. We also provide detailed procedures for characterizing the resulting iPSC lines, including the analysis of pluripotency marker expression by RT-qPCR, immunolabeling, and fluorescent-associated cell sorting, the evaluation of pluripotency by teratoma production and genetic stability by karyotyping. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 26% |
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 23% |
Unknown | 3 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 40% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 3 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2014.
All research outputs
#18,384,336
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,867
of 13,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,773
of 361,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#495
of 1,033 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,033 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.