↓ Skip to main content

Hypoxia

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 8: Hypoxia
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Hypoxia
Chapter number 8
Book title
Hypoxia
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-7678-9_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4899-7676-5, 978-1-4899-7678-9, 978-1-4899-7676-5, 978-1-4899-7678-9
Authors

Storz, Jay F, Cheviron, Zachary A, Jay F. Storz, Zachary A. Cheviron, Storz, Jay F., Cheviron, Zachary A.

Editors

Robert C. Roach, Peter H. Hackett, Peter D. Wagner

Abstract

Recent studies of indigenous human populations at high altitude have provided proof-of-principle that genome scans of DNA polymorphism can be used to identify candidate loci for hypoxia adaptation. When integrated with experimental analyses of physiological phenotypes, genome-wide surveys of DNA polymorphism and tissue-specific transcriptional profiles can provide insights into actual mechanisms of adaptation. It has been suggested that adaptive phenotypic evolution is largely mediated by cis-regulatory changes in genes that are located at integrative control points in regulatory networks. This hypothesis can be tested by conducting transcriptomic analyses of hypoxic signaling pathways in conjunction with experimental measures of vascular oxygen supply and metabolic pathway flux. Such studies may reveal whether the architecture of gene regulatory networks can be used to predict which loci (and which types of loci) are likely to be "hot spots" for adaptive physiological evolution. Functional genomic studies of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) demonstrate how the integrated analysis of variation in tissue-specific transcriptomes, whole-animal physiological performance, and various subordinate traits can yield insights into the mechanistic underpinnings of high-altitude adaptation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 29%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 18%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Unknown 12 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2017.
All research outputs
#12,767,056
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,714
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,549
of 352,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#16
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.