Chapter title |
Staging Early Esophageal Cancer.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 9 |
Book title |
Stem Cells, Pre-neoplasia, and Early Cancer of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract
|
Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-41388-4_9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-941386-0, 978-3-31-941388-4
|
Authors |
O. J. Old, M. Isabelle, H. Barr |
Editors |
Marnix Jansen, Nicholas A. Wright |
Abstract |
Staging esophageal cancer provides a standardized measure of the extent of disease that can be used to inform decisions about therapy and guide prognosis. For esophageal cancer, the treatment pathways vary greatly depending on stage of disease, and accurate staging is therefore crucial in ensuring the optimal therapy for each patient. For early esophageal cancer (T1 lesions), endoscopic resection can be curative and simultaneously gives accurate staging of depth of invasion. For tumors invading the submucosa or more advanced disease, comprehensive investigation is required to accurately stage the tumor and assess suitability for curative resection. A combined imaging approach of computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) offers complementary diagnostic information and gives the greatest chance of accurate staging. Staging laparoscopy can identify peritoneal disease and small superficial liver lesions that could be missed on CT or PET, and alters management in up to 20 % of patients. Optical diagnostic techniques offer the prospect of further extending the possibilities of endoscopic staging in real time. Optical coherence tomography can image superficial lesions and could provide information on depth of invasion for these lesions. Real-time lymph node analysis using optical diagnostics such as Raman spectroscopy could be used to support immediate endoscopic therapy without waiting for results of cytology or further investigations. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
Librarian | 2 | 10% |
Researcher | 2 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 15% |
Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 45% |
Engineering | 2 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 40% |