↓ Skip to main content

Bioinformatics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 15: Identifying Optimal Models of Evolution.
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Identifying Optimal Models of Evolution.
Chapter number 15
Book title
Bioinformatics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6622-6_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6620-2, 978-1-4939-6622-6
Authors

Lars S. Jermiin, Vivek Jayaswal, Faisal M. Ababneh, John Robinson

Editors

Jonathan M. Keith

Abstract

Most phylogenetic methods are model-based and depend on models of evolution designed to approximate the evolutionary processes. Several methods have been developed to identify suitable models of evolution for phylogenetic analysis of alignments of nucleotide or amino acid sequences and some of these methods are now firmly embedded in the phylogenetic protocol. However, in a disturbingly large number of cases, it appears that these models were used without acknowledgement of their inherent shortcomings. In this chapter, we discuss the problem of model selection and show how some of the inherent shortcomings may be identified and overcome.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 27%
Researcher 6 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%